a cross-sectional analysis of the UK Biobank

Funding Information: National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) School for Public Health Research, World Cancer Research Fund.This study is supported by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) School for Public Health Research (SPHR) (Grant Reference Number NIHR 204000). The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care. Funding for grant IIG_FULL_2020_033 was obtained from World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF UK), as part of the World Cancer Research Fund International grant programme. CM is supported by the NIHR Global Health Research Centre on NCDs and Environmental Change (NIHR203247). The funders had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, interpretation of study findings, writing of the report, or decision to submit the paper for publication. Where authors are identified as personnel of the International Agency for Research on Cancer/World Health Organization, the authors alone are responsible for the views expressed in this article and they do not necessarily represent the decisions, policy or views of the International Agency for Research on Cancer/World Health Organization. This research has been conducted using the UK Biobank Resource under Application Number 29239. The authors would like to thank the participants of the UK Biobank study. Funding Information: This study is supported by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) School for Public Health Research (SPHR) (Grant Reference Number NIHR 204000). The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care. Funding for grant IIG_FULL_2020_033 was obtained from World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF UK), as part of the World Cancer Research Fund International grant programme. CM is supported by the NIHR Global Health Research Centre on NCDs and Environmental Change (NIHR203247). The funders had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, interpretation of study findings, writing of the report, or decision to submit the paper for publication. Publisher Copyright: © 2024

Publication Details

Journal
Universidade Nova de Lisboa's Repository (Universidade Nova de Lisboa)
Published
2024-11-28
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

a cross-sectional analysis of the UK Biobank

Universidade Nova de Lisboa's Repository (Universidade Nova de Lisboa)
Ethics in Clinical Research
article

a cross-sectional analysis of the UK Biobank

article en

Abstract

Funding Information: National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) School for Public Health Research, World Cancer Research Fund.This study is supported by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) School for Public Health Research (SPHR) (Grant Reference Number NIHR 204000). The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care. Funding for grant IIG_FULL_2020_033 was obtained from World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF UK), as part of the World Cancer Research Fund International grant programme. CM is supported by the NIHR Global Health Research Centre on NCDs and Environmental Change (NIHR203247). The funders had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, interpretation of study findings, writing of the report, or decision to submit the paper for publication. Where authors are identified as personnel of the International Agency for Research on Cancer/World Health Organization, the authors alone are responsible for the views expressed in this article and they do not necessarily represent the decisions, policy or views of the International Agency for Research on Cancer/World Health Organization. This research has been conducted using the UK Biobank Resource under Application Number 29239. The authors would like to thank the participants of the UK Biobank study. Funding Information: This study is supported by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) School for Public Health Research (SPHR) (Grant Reference Number NIHR 204000). The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care. Funding for grant IIG_FULL_2020_033 was obtained from World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF UK), as part of the World Cancer Research Fund International grant programme. CM is supported by the NIHR Global Health Research Centre on NCDs and Environmental Change (NIHR203247). The funders had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, interpretation of study findings, writing of the report, or decision to submit the paper for publication. Publisher Copyright: © 2024

Universidade Nova de Lisboa's Repository (Universidade Nova de Lisboa)
World Health Organization, World Cancer Research Fund International, National Institute for Health and Care Research, Department of Health and Social Care, World Cancer Research Fund, School for Public Health Research
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Ethics in Clinical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.