A Divergence in the Peninsula: Why has North Korea Developed Nuclear Weapons, Yet South Korea Has Refrained? Predicting Iran's Nuclear Future Using a Comparative Case Study

This paper analyzes the conditions under which states develop nuclear weapons. North and South Korea present cases of similarly situated states going in opposite directions concerning nuclear weapons development. By analyzing the climactic movements in North and South Korean history of nuclear weapons development, I have determined that states need two necessary conditions to develop nuclear weapons: motivation and means. States are motivated by a security concern. When this is coupled with means in the form of state capability, either from sufficient domestic economic advancement or foreign aid, nuclear weapons development occurs. This issue has modern policy implications in security and regional stability. In the case of Iran, nuclear weapons development is likely, as both conditions of security concern, and state capability are present. Identifying these conditions can help determine how to shape policies to prevent nuclear proliferation and restrict a regime that is widely considered unstable from gaining this type of potential for destruction.

Publication Details

Journal
Open Access Journals at BC (Boston College)
Published
2025-12-04
Primary Topic
Economic Sanctions and International Relations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Divergence in the Peninsula: Why has North Korea Developed Nuclear Weapons, Yet South Korea Has Refrained? Predicting Iran's Nuclear Future Using a Comparative Case Study

Open Access Journals at BC (Boston College)
Economic Sanctions and International Relations
article

A Divergence in the Peninsula: Why has North Korea Developed Nuclear Weapons, Yet South Korea Has Refrained? Predicting Iran's Nuclear Future Using a Comparative Case Study

article en

Abstract

This paper analyzes the conditions under which states develop nuclear weapons. North and South Korea present cases of similarly situated states going in opposite directions concerning nuclear weapons development. By analyzing the climactic movements in North and South Korean history of nuclear weapons development, I have determined that states need two necessary conditions to develop nuclear weapons: motivation and means. States are motivated by a security concern. When this is coupled with means in the form of state capability, either from sufficient domestic economic advancement or foreign aid, nuclear weapons development occurs. This issue has modern policy implications in security and regional stability. In the case of Iran, nuclear weapons development is likely, as both conditions of security concern, and state capability are present. Identifying these conditions can help determine how to shape policies to prevent nuclear proliferation and restrict a regime that is widely considered unstable from gaining this type of potential for destruction.

Open Access Journals at BC (Boston College)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Economic Sanctions and International Relations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Divergence in the Peninsula: Why has North Korea Developed Nuclear Weapons, Yet South Korea Has Refrained? Predicting Iran's Nuclear Future Using a Comparative Case Study · Open Access Journals at BC (Boston College) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS