The evolution of industrial relations research methods: a review of key union effects studies from the late 20th to early 21st century

This chapter explores changing methodological trends in industrial relations (IR) research in recent decades by examining the empirical approaches taken by key studies on union effects, a core subject in the field. We explore how the methodological disposition of the field has changed since the late 20th century. We contrast the approaches used against a typology proposed in the 1980s encouraging hierarchical methodological development. Finally, we consider the main outcomes tested by scholars and most common approaches used to examine them over time. The chapter sheds light on the rich diversity of methodological thinking in our field, while highlighting some relatively under-utilised areas.

Publication Details

Journal
London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science)
Published
2024-11-28
Primary Topic
Labor Movements and Unions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The evolution of industrial relations research methods: a review of key union effects studies from the late 20th to early 21st century

London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science)
Labor Movements and Unions
article

The evolution of industrial relations research methods: a review of key union effects studies from the late 20th to early 21st century

article en

Abstract

This chapter explores changing methodological trends in industrial relations (IR) research in recent decades by examining the empirical approaches taken by key studies on union effects, a core subject in the field. We explore how the methodological disposition of the field has changed since the late 20th century. We contrast the approaches used against a typology proposed in the 1980s encouraging hierarchical methodological development. Finally, we consider the main outcomes tested by scholars and most common approaches used to examine them over time. The chapter sheds light on the rich diversity of methodological thinking in our field, while highlighting some relatively under-utilised areas.

London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science)
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Labor Movements and Unions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.