Principal factor and reliability analysis of the Malay version of DASS21, CBI and Brief COPE questionnaire among Malaysian OSH competent person

Background: Questionnaire has long been one of the acceptable form of data collection tools for medical and health sciences. It is convenient and reliable when used and psychometrically tested to the intended populations. This study aims to evaluate the principal factor and reliability analysis of the Malay versions of DASS21, CBI and Brief-COPE questionnaire among Malaysian OSH competent person. Methods: A total of 40 OSH competent persons participated in the study. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 26.0 software was used for statistical analysis. Principal Factor Analysis was computed to assess factor analysis, while Cronbach's alpha and the intraclass correlation coefficient for individual items were used to measure the internal consistency and reliability of the questionnaires. Results: Principal Factor Analysis revealed that the number of components and items in each questionnaire aligned with the original versions, and the Kaiser’s criterion along with Cattell’s rule supported the appropriate number of factors to be retained for each questionnaire. Reliability testing indicated that all questionnaires demonstrated high internal consistency and exhibited good to excellent reliability, with Cronbach’s alpha values ranging from 0.900 to 0.951 and intraclass correlation coefficient values ranging from 0.895 to 0.946. Conclusion: This study showed that the Malay versions of DASS21, CBI and Brief-COPE questionnaires are validated tools for use among Malaysian OSH competent persons

Publication Details

Journal
The International Islamic University Malaysia Repository (The International Islamic University Malaysia)
Published
2025-11-05
Primary Topic
Health Education and Validation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Principal factor and reliability analysis of the Malay version of DASS21, CBI and Brief COPE questionnaire among Malaysian OSH competent person

The International Islamic University Malaysia Repository (The International Islamic University Malaysia)
Health Education and Validation
article

Principal factor and reliability analysis of the Malay version of DASS21, CBI and Brief COPE questionnaire among Malaysian OSH competent person

article en

Abstract

Background: Questionnaire has long been one of the acceptable form of data collection tools for medical and health sciences. It is convenient and reliable when used and psychometrically tested to the intended populations. This study aims to evaluate the principal factor and reliability analysis of the Malay versions of DASS21, CBI and Brief-COPE questionnaire among Malaysian OSH competent person. Methods: A total of 40 OSH competent persons participated in the study. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 26.0 software was used for statistical analysis. Principal Factor Analysis was computed to assess factor analysis, while Cronbach's alpha and the intraclass correlation coefficient for individual items were used to measure the internal consistency and reliability of the questionnaires. Results: Principal Factor Analysis revealed that the number of components and items in each questionnaire aligned with the original versions, and the Kaiser’s criterion along with Cattell’s rule supported the appropriate number of factors to be retained for each questionnaire. Reliability testing indicated that all questionnaires demonstrated high internal consistency and exhibited good to excellent reliability, with Cronbach’s alpha values ranging from 0.900 to 0.951 and intraclass correlation coefficient values ranging from 0.895 to 0.946. Conclusion: This study showed that the Malay versions of DASS21, CBI and Brief-COPE questionnaires are validated tools for use among Malaysian OSH competent persons

The International Islamic University Malaysia Repository (The International Islamic University Malaysia)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Health Education and Validation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.