Brazilian conditional cash transfer programme’s impact on youth human capital outcomes: the 2004 Pelotas Birth Cohort

Introduction: Brazil’s Bolsa Família Programme (BFP) is one of the largest conditional cash transfer (CCT) programmes globally. This study evaluated the impact of BFP during childhood on human capital outcomes at age 18. Methods: We analysed data from 2743 participants in the 2004 Pelotas Birth Cohort. BFP participation was assessed at ages 6 and 11, and outcomes at age 18 included grade repetition, being neither in school nor working, criminal behaviour, tobacco use, binge drinking and drug use. To address selection bias, we used Propensity Score Matching to estimate the average treatment effect on the treated (ATT). Results: No significant effects of BFP participation at ages 6 or 11 were observed for most outcomes: not studying or working (ATT 0.01; 95% CI −0.04 to 0.06), tobacco use (ATT −0.03; 95% CI −0.10 to 0.05), binge drinking (ATT −0.05; 95% CI −0.15 to 0.05), violent crime (ATT 0.00; 95% CI −0.08 to 0.07) or any crime (ATT −0.06; 95% CI −0.14 to 0.03). Weak evidence suggested reductions in non-violent crime (ATT −0.04; 95% CI −0.09 to 0.01; p=0.072) and drug use (ATT −0.07; 95% CI −0.17 to 0.02; p=0.075), but a possible increase in grade repetition (ATT 0.07; 95% CI −0.02 to 0.16; p=0.097). Analyses of BFP receipt at only one time point showed no effects, indicating that longer exposure may be necessary for impact. Conclusions: Participation in the BFP during childhood was not associated with significant improvements in most human capital outcomes at age 18. Nonetheless, potential reductions in drug use and non-violent crime, and the complex relationship with school performance, warrant further investigation into the long-term and multidimensional effects of CCTs. These results are specific to the Pelotas cohort and may not be generalisable to different geographical settings within Brazil.

Publication Details

Journal
London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science)
Published
2025-11-10
Primary Topic
Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Brazilian conditional cash transfer programme’s impact on youth human capital outcomes: the 2004 Pelotas Birth Cohort

London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science)
Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare
article

Brazilian conditional cash transfer programme’s impact on youth human capital outcomes: the 2004 Pelotas Birth Cohort

article en

Abstract

Introduction: Brazil’s Bolsa Família Programme (BFP) is one of the largest conditional cash transfer (CCT) programmes globally. This study evaluated the impact of BFP during childhood on human capital outcomes at age 18. Methods: We analysed data from 2743 participants in the 2004 Pelotas Birth Cohort. BFP participation was assessed at ages 6 and 11, and outcomes at age 18 included grade repetition, being neither in school nor working, criminal behaviour, tobacco use, binge drinking and drug use. To address selection bias, we used Propensity Score Matching to estimate the average treatment effect on the treated (ATT). Results: No significant effects of BFP participation at ages 6 or 11 were observed for most outcomes: not studying or working (ATT 0.01; 95% CI −0.04 to 0.06), tobacco use (ATT −0.03; 95% CI −0.10 to 0.05), binge drinking (ATT −0.05; 95% CI −0.15 to 0.05), violent crime (ATT 0.00; 95% CI −0.08 to 0.07) or any crime (ATT −0.06; 95% CI −0.14 to 0.03). Weak evidence suggested reductions in non-violent crime (ATT −0.04; 95% CI −0.09 to 0.01; p=0.072) and drug use (ATT −0.07; 95% CI −0.17 to 0.02; p=0.075), but a possible increase in grade repetition (ATT 0.07; 95% CI −0.02 to 0.16; p=0.097). Analyses of BFP receipt at only one time point showed no effects, indicating that longer exposure may be necessary for impact. Conclusions: Participation in the BFP during childhood was not associated with significant improvements in most human capital outcomes at age 18. Nonetheless, potential reductions in drug use and non-violent crime, and the complex relationship with school performance, warrant further investigation into the long-term and multidimensional effects of CCTs. These results are specific to the Pelotas cohort and may not be generalisable to different geographical settings within Brazil.

London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science)
Wellcome Trust, UK Research and Innovation, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Ministério da Saúde, Associação Brasileira de Saúde Coletiva, Economic and Social Research Council
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Brazilian conditional cash transfer programme’s impact on youth human capital outcomes: the 2004 Pelotas Birth Cohort · London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS