Navigating the Labyrinth: Ethical Reflections before, during and after ethnographic work with the Nordic Manosphere

This article presents and reflects on the ethical challenges when conducting digital ethnography in the Nordic Manosphere. Drawing on empirical cases from two qualitative projects within the Nordic manosphere, the article identifies tensions in conducting ethnographic fieldwork, accessing the field, and disseminating findings, offering methodological guidance in navigating these.<br/><br/>The empirical material includes extensive fieldnotes, interviews, and reflexive accounts of ethical decision-making. We conducted a preliminary cross-case analysis to identify similarities and differences in ethical tensions, followed by tracing and mapping these tensions across the phases of fieldwork: before, during, and after.<br/><br/>Before entering the field, tensions arose around negotiating access, balancing curiosity about participants, versus legitimizing harmful ideologies, and deciding which researcher presence to signal. During fieldwork, dilemmas centered on managing asymmetries in the research relationship, listening critically without endorsing problematic views, and navigating moments where research recruitment itself became part of the field’s dynamics. After fieldwork, tensions re-emerged around how to represent the field ethically, how to disseminate knowledge without reinforcing harm, betraying trust, or misrepresenting participants.<br/><br/>Seen together, these tensions illustrate that ethics in politicized digital spaces is not a matter of isolated moments but an ongoing negotiation, as ethical reflections continually fold back into the environments it studies.<br/><br/>Ultimately, the article adds to discussions on navigating digital environments and promotes viewing fieldwork as a continuous, relational engagement rather than a practice of extraction and departure. Navigating the ethical labyrinth thus calls for an approach where ethics and methods evolve in relation to the field, rather than something being imposed apriori.

Publication Details

Published
2025-10-16
Primary Topic
Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Navigating the Labyrinth: Ethical Reflections before, during and after ethnographic work with the Nordic Manosphere

Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
article

Navigating the Labyrinth: Ethical Reflections before, during and after ethnographic work with the Nordic Manosphere

article en

Abstract

This article presents and reflects on the ethical challenges when conducting digital ethnography in the Nordic Manosphere. Drawing on empirical cases from two qualitative projects within the Nordic manosphere, the article identifies tensions in conducting ethnographic fieldwork, accessing the field, and disseminating findings, offering methodological guidance in navigating these.<br/><br/>The empirical material includes extensive fieldnotes, interviews, and reflexive accounts of ethical decision-making. We conducted a preliminary cross-case analysis to identify similarities and differences in ethical tensions, followed by tracing and mapping these tensions across the phases of fieldwork: before, during, and after.<br/><br/>Before entering the field, tensions arose around negotiating access, balancing curiosity about participants, versus legitimizing harmful ideologies, and deciding which researcher presence to signal. During fieldwork, dilemmas centered on managing asymmetries in the research relationship, listening critically without endorsing problematic views, and navigating moments where research recruitment itself became part of the field’s dynamics. After fieldwork, tensions re-emerged around how to represent the field ethically, how to disseminate knowledge without reinforcing harm, betraying trust, or misrepresenting participants.<br/><br/>Seen together, these tensions illustrate that ethics in politicized digital spaces is not a matter of isolated moments but an ongoing negotiation, as ethical reflections continually fold back into the environments it studies.<br/><br/>Ultimately, the article adds to discussions on navigating digital environments and promotes viewing fieldwork as a continuous, relational engagement rather than a practice of extraction and departure. Navigating the ethical labyrinth thus calls for an approach where ethics and methods evolve in relation to the field, rather than something being imposed apriori.

Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.