Benefits of patient and public involvement in cancer research: literature review

Abstract Currently, cancer research allows for earlier diagnosis and more effective treatments. The complexity and socio-economic impact of the disease require innovative approaches such as patient and public involvement in research. The aim of this review is to identify the benefits of patients and public involvement in cancer research. The scale for non-systematic reviews, Scale for the Assessment of Narrative Review Articles (SANRA), was followed. There are individual, ongoing research, ethical and social benefits from this holistic approach that meets the expectations and demands of people and those involved in providing healthcare to people with cancer. Ensuring that the needs, perspectives and concerns of these people are taken into account leads results that promote transparency and trust for the scientific community and clinical practice. In conclusion, patient and public involvement in cancer research contributes to improving the quality of research.

Publication Details

Journal
Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT)
Published
2025-06-01
Primary Topic
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Benefits of patient and public involvement in cancer research: literature review

Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT)
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
article

Benefits of patient and public involvement in cancer research: literature review

article en

Abstract

Abstract Currently, cancer research allows for earlier diagnosis and more effective treatments. The complexity and socio-economic impact of the disease require innovative approaches such as patient and public involvement in research. The aim of this review is to identify the benefits of patients and public involvement in cancer research. The scale for non-systematic reviews, Scale for the Assessment of Narrative Review Articles (SANRA), was followed. There are individual, ongoing research, ethical and social benefits from this holistic approach that meets the expectations and demands of people and those involved in providing healthcare to people with cancer. Ensuring that the needs, perspectives and concerns of these people are taken into account leads results that promote transparency and trust for the scientific community and clinical practice. In conclusion, patient and public involvement in cancer research contributes to improving the quality of research.

Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.