Testing and Quantifying Economic Resilience

ABSTRACT Assessing whether an economy returns to its pre‐crisis growth path is central to the study of economic resilience, yet standard econometric tools are difficult to apply to global crises: they require a cross‐section of unaffected control economies and are vulnerable to bias when persistence is estimated from data containing structural breaks. We develop a formal testing procedure that overcomes both limitations by constructing a counterfactual no‐crisis trajectory from pre‐crisis data alone and comparing the realized path against forecast intervals. Building on this test, we propose two unit‐free measures, shock absorption and cumulative recovery. Applying the framework to real GDP for 18 advanced OECD economies, we find that most were not resilient to the Global Financial Crisis but recovered strongly from COVID‐19, which combined deeper troughs with faster rebounds. These contrasting episodes indicate that resilience is not governed by a single set of determinants and depends on the nature of the crisis.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Regional Science
Published
2026-09-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jors.70098
Primary Topic
Regional resilience and development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Testing and Quantifying Economic Resilience

Journal of Regional Science
Regional resilience and development
article

Testing and Quantifying Economic Resilience

article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Assessing whether an economy returns to its pre‐crisis growth path is central to the study of economic resilience, yet standard econometric tools are difficult to apply to global crises: they require a cross‐section of unaffected control economies and are vulnerable to bias when persistence is estimated from data containing structural breaks. We develop a formal testing procedure that overcomes both limitations by constructing a counterfactual no‐crisis trajectory from pre‐crisis data alone and comparing the realized path against forecast intervals. Building on this test, we propose two unit‐free measures, shock absorption and cumulative recovery. Applying the framework to real GDP for 18 advanced OECD economies, we find that most were not resilient to the Global Financial Crisis but recovered strongly from COVID‐19, which combined deeper troughs with faster rebounds. These contrasting episodes indicate that resilience is not governed by a single set of determinants and depends on the nature of the crisis.

Journal of Regional Science
Hitotsubashi University (JP), Tokyo Institute of Technology (JP), Seikei University (JP)
Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, University of Tokyo
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
Regional resilience and development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Testing and Quantifying Economic Resilience · Journal of Regional Science (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS