Comparative Analysis of Articulated Steering Efficiency: Conventional Orbital Steering vs. Electro-Hydrostatic in a Wheel Loader

This paper investigates the energy efficiency of an articulated steering system in a wheel loader, focusing on a comparative study between conventional Orbital Steering Unit (OSP) and a proposed Electro-Hydrostatic Steering (EHS) system. The conventional OSP on a large wheel loader serves as the benchmark for evaluating the hydraulic power consumption during different steering maneuvers. For the conventional steering the power delivered by the load-sensing hydrostatic pump is calculated from the experimental data and losses in the OSP unit are calculated. Whereas, for the EHS the mechanical power needed to operate the fixed displacement pump is considered as input and losses are calculated for performing the same steering profile while delivering similar dynamic steering performance, using the simulation model. It has been found that in the OSP steering system the efficiency remained at around 40%, whereas in the EHS system it ranges from 69.4% to 81.3%.

Publication Details

Journal
VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet)
Published
2024-10-01
Primary Topic
Hydraulic and Pneumatic Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis of Articulated Steering Efficiency: Conventional Orbital Steering vs. Electro-Hydrostatic in a Wheel Loader

VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet)
Hydraulic and Pneumatic Systems
article

Comparative Analysis of Articulated Steering Efficiency: Conventional Orbital Steering vs. Electro-Hydrostatic in a Wheel Loader

article en

Abstract

This paper investigates the energy efficiency of an articulated steering system in a wheel loader, focusing on a comparative study between conventional Orbital Steering Unit (OSP) and a proposed Electro-Hydrostatic Steering (EHS) system. The conventional OSP on a large wheel loader serves as the benchmark for evaluating the hydraulic power consumption during different steering maneuvers. For the conventional steering the power delivered by the load-sensing hydrostatic pump is calculated from the experimental data and losses in the OSP unit are calculated. Whereas, for the EHS the mechanical power needed to operate the fixed displacement pump is considered as input and losses are calculated for performing the same steering profile while delivering similar dynamic steering performance, using the simulation model. It has been found that in the OSP steering system the efficiency remained at around 40%, whereas in the EHS system it ranges from 69.4% to 81.3%.

VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Hydraulic and Pneumatic Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.