Who Owns Their Dead: Unequal Access To Repatriation in US Law

Museums and scientific institutions in the United States house human remains and important cultural objects in their collections; materials obtained in various manners over the past few centuries. In 1990, Congress passed the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act, which mandated that federally funded institutions return Native remains and cultural objects to the affiliated tribe. Over the last three decades the rules have been modified a couple of times with the input of tribes and institutions. This has become an ongoing negotiation process as both public and professional conversations change. In recent conversations of repatriation, the topic has even expanded outside of Native claims and into African American claims. Understanding these conversations is critical to understanding the evolving process of repatriation. This paper's purpose is to analyze the conversations from the past and today concerning federally unrecognized tribes' access to repatriation and the emerging discussion surrounding African American access to repatriation.

Publication Details

Journal
UNI ScholarWorks (University of Northern Iowa)
Published
2025-04-07
Primary Topic
Archaeological Research and Protection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Who Owns Their Dead: Unequal Access To Repatriation in US Law

UNI ScholarWorks (University of Northern Iowa)
Archaeological Research and Protection
article

Who Owns Their Dead: Unequal Access To Repatriation in US Law

article en

Abstract

Museums and scientific institutions in the United States house human remains and important cultural objects in their collections; materials obtained in various manners over the past few centuries. In 1990, Congress passed the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act, which mandated that federally funded institutions return Native remains and cultural objects to the affiliated tribe. Over the last three decades the rules have been modified a couple of times with the input of tribes and institutions. This has become an ongoing negotiation process as both public and professional conversations change. In recent conversations of repatriation, the topic has even expanded outside of Native claims and into African American claims. Understanding these conversations is critical to understanding the evolving process of repatriation. This paper's purpose is to analyze the conversations from the past and today concerning federally unrecognized tribes' access to repatriation and the emerging discussion surrounding African American access to repatriation.

UNI ScholarWorks (University of Northern Iowa)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Archaeological Research and Protection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.