Using screen recordings to assess how students use GenAI tools in the foreign language writing process : insights for language teachers

University students have overwhelmingly adopted AI tools when they write in their second language (L2). These include machine translation (MT) tools (Delorme Benites et al. 2021), which have been very popular among L2 learners for several years now, as well as new generative AI (GenAI) tools, such as general-purpose assistants like ChatGPT or Copilot as well as writing enhancement tools such as DeepL Write or Grammarly. Studies have shown that students are not necessarily GenAI literate (Barrett & Pack 2023), but not much is known about how they interact with these tools. Our presentation will report on data gathered in spring 2025 at a Swiss university to understand how students use different tools when writing in the L2. Using screen recording software, we recorded the writing process of 40 mostly French-speaking students when they produced a 300-word essay in English. The use of all external resources (GenAI and other language tools such as dictionaries) were coded based on a coding system for analysing information seeking activities (Hunziker Heeb 2020). We looked at the different reasons for using GenAI and how GenAI queries are related to the use of other external resources, such as MT or online corpora. In addition, the prompts produced by the students were compared and analysed for their complexity, such as their inclusion of contextual information or assigning a role to the GenAI tool. The results are merged to develop different writer profiles in the age of GenAI, akin to Hellmich’s (2021) development of MT user profiles. The results of this study reveal how students can use GenAI tools to improve their language production in ways that are conductive to learning. They also provide us with a better understanding of the type of training that students need in order to become literate users of GenAI tools, thus providing teachers with insights on how to incorporate these tools in writing tasks and courses.

Publication Details

Journal
Zürcher Hochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaften digital collection (Zurich University of Applied Sciences)
Published
2025-11-14
Primary Topic
Text Readability and Simplification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using screen recordings to assess how students use GenAI tools in the foreign language writing process : insights for language teachers

Zürcher Hochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaften digital collection (Zurich University of Applied Sciences)
Text Readability and Simplification
article

Using screen recordings to assess how students use GenAI tools in the foreign language writing process : insights for language teachers

article en

Abstract

University students have overwhelmingly adopted AI tools when they write in their second language (L2). These include machine translation (MT) tools (Delorme Benites et al. 2021), which have been very popular among L2 learners for several years now, as well as new generative AI (GenAI) tools, such as general-purpose assistants like ChatGPT or Copilot as well as writing enhancement tools such as DeepL Write or Grammarly. Studies have shown that students are not necessarily GenAI literate (Barrett & Pack 2023), but not much is known about how they interact with these tools. Our presentation will report on data gathered in spring 2025 at a Swiss university to understand how students use different tools when writing in the L2. Using screen recording software, we recorded the writing process of 40 mostly French-speaking students when they produced a 300-word essay in English. The use of all external resources (GenAI and other language tools such as dictionaries) were coded based on a coding system for analysing information seeking activities (Hunziker Heeb 2020). We looked at the different reasons for using GenAI and how GenAI queries are related to the use of other external resources, such as MT or online corpora. In addition, the prompts produced by the students were compared and analysed for their complexity, such as their inclusion of contextual information or assigning a role to the GenAI tool. The results are merged to develop different writer profiles in the age of GenAI, akin to Hellmich’s (2021) development of MT user profiles. The results of this study reveal how students can use GenAI tools to improve their language production in ways that are conductive to learning. They also provide us with a better understanding of the type of training that students need in order to become literate users of GenAI tools, thus providing teachers with insights on how to incorporate these tools in writing tasks and courses.

Zürcher Hochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaften digital collection (Zurich University of Applied Sciences)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Text Readability and Simplification
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.