Beyond Tying Knots: Can Venous Bypass Shape the Future of Testicular Hemodynamics in Varicocele Treatment? – A Systematic Review

Albert Ciam, Ricky Adriansjah Urology Department, Hasan Sadikin Academic Medical Center, Universitas Padjajaran, Bandung, IndonesiaCorrespondence: Ricky Adriansjah, Urology Department, Hasan Sadikin Academic Medical Center, Universitas Padjadjaran, Jl. Prof. Eyckman No. 38, Bandung, West Java, 40161, Indonesia, Tel +62 811-2296-136, Email [email protected]: Varicocele, present in 15– 20% of males and linked to 35– 40% of primary infertility, is commonly treated with microsurgical ligation. This review compares venous shunting techniques such as spermatic-inferior epigastric vein anastomosis with ligation in terms of efficacy, safety, and clinical outcomes, especially in complex cases like recurrence or Nutcracker Syndrome.Methods: We included randomized, prospective, retrospective, and cohort studies comparing venous shunting (eg, spermatic-inferior epigastric vein anastomosis) with ligation or without control group. We searched PubMed, EBSCO, ProQuest, EMBASE, and Scopus on 31 April 2025. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and JBI (Joanna Briggs Institute) for case series. Outcomes assessed included operative time, semen parameters, hormonal levels, recurrence, and complications. This study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251060842).Results: Twelve studies (n = 420 patients) were included. Shunting demonstrated improvements in semen quality (eg, sperm motility: 59.4% vs 41.6% post-ligation) and lower recurrence rates (0– 5% vs 5– 15%). However, operative times were longer (99– 146 vs 48– 92 minutes). Shunting also showed benefits in vascular parameters and testicular volume, particularly in NCS-associated cases. Complications were rare, with minor issues like scrotal edema reported.Conclusion: Venous shunting shows promise as an alternative in selected varicocele patients, with potential benefits in semen motility, pain relief, and recurrence reduction. However, the current evidence is limited, heterogeneous, and largely non-randomized. Shunting should therefore be considered experimental, requiring advanced microsurgical expertise, and further high-quality trials are needed before incorporation into standard guidelines.Keywords: varicocele, venous bypass, microsurgical anastomosis, male infertility

Publication Details

Journal
Dove Medical Press (Taylor and Francis Group)
Published
2025-12-04
Primary Topic
Vascular anomalies and interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond Tying Knots: Can Venous Bypass Shape the Future of Testicular Hemodynamics in Varicocele Treatment? – A Systematic Review

Dove Medical Press (Taylor and Francis Group)
Vascular anomalies and interventions
article

Beyond Tying Knots: Can Venous Bypass Shape the Future of Testicular Hemodynamics in Varicocele Treatment? – A Systematic Review

article en

Abstract

Albert Ciam, Ricky Adriansjah Urology Department, Hasan Sadikin Academic Medical Center, Universitas Padjajaran, Bandung, IndonesiaCorrespondence: Ricky Adriansjah, Urology Department, Hasan Sadikin Academic Medical Center, Universitas Padjadjaran, Jl. Prof. Eyckman No. 38, Bandung, West Java, 40161, Indonesia, Tel +62 811-2296-136, Email [email protected]: Varicocele, present in 15– 20% of males and linked to 35– 40% of primary infertility, is commonly treated with microsurgical ligation. This review compares venous shunting techniques such as spermatic-inferior epigastric vein anastomosis with ligation in terms of efficacy, safety, and clinical outcomes, especially in complex cases like recurrence or Nutcracker Syndrome.Methods: We included randomized, prospective, retrospective, and cohort studies comparing venous shunting (eg, spermatic-inferior epigastric vein anastomosis) with ligation or without control group. We searched PubMed, EBSCO, ProQuest, EMBASE, and Scopus on 31 April 2025. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and JBI (Joanna Briggs Institute) for case series. Outcomes assessed included operative time, semen parameters, hormonal levels, recurrence, and complications. This study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251060842).Results: Twelve studies (n = 420 patients) were included. Shunting demonstrated improvements in semen quality (eg, sperm motility: 59.4% vs 41.6% post-ligation) and lower recurrence rates (0– 5% vs 5– 15%). However, operative times were longer (99– 146 vs 48– 92 minutes). Shunting also showed benefits in vascular parameters and testicular volume, particularly in NCS-associated cases. Complications were rare, with minor issues like scrotal edema reported.Conclusion: Venous shunting shows promise as an alternative in selected varicocele patients, with potential benefits in semen motility, pain relief, and recurrence reduction. However, the current evidence is limited, heterogeneous, and largely non-randomized. Shunting should therefore be considered experimental, requiring advanced microsurgical expertise, and further high-quality trials are needed before incorporation into standard guidelines.Keywords: varicocele, venous bypass, microsurgical anastomosis, male infertility

Dove Medical Press (Taylor and Francis Group)
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Vascular anomalies and interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.