Guided Choices: The ethics of using algorithmic systems to shape philanthropic decision-making

In this chapter, we consider various ways in which artificial intelligence (AI) could be used to shape individual choices, how these apply to different contexts in which decisions about philanthropic giving might be made, and the ethical questions this raises. We explore why choice is an inherent element of philanthropy and why the potential for algorithmic processes to affect how we make choices is, therefore, likely to profoundly impact philanthropic giving. AI can shape individual choices in three main ways: using algorithms to determine responses to requests for information, using algorithms to provide personalized recommendations and enable “hyper-nudging,” and using AI-generated content to prompt emotional responses and thus drive behavior. Each of these approaches is then applied to the context of philanthropy through the lens of three groups of actors that play significant roles in our online giving decisions: general-purpose search and recommendation services, giving platforms, and individual cause-based organizations. We argue that AI could play a significant role in encouraging people to give, and in influencing how they give. However, there are also potentially significant risks and ethical concerns associated with doing so. We identify these risks and concerns and suggest actions that can be taken to mitigate them when using AI to shape the giving choices of individual donors.

Publication Details

Journal
Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent)
Published
2024-11-07
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Guided Choices: The ethics of using algorithmic systems to shape philanthropic decision-making

Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Guided Choices: The ethics of using algorithmic systems to shape philanthropic decision-making

article en

Abstract

In this chapter, we consider various ways in which artificial intelligence (AI) could be used to shape individual choices, how these apply to different contexts in which decisions about philanthropic giving might be made, and the ethical questions this raises. We explore why choice is an inherent element of philanthropy and why the potential for algorithmic processes to affect how we make choices is, therefore, likely to profoundly impact philanthropic giving. AI can shape individual choices in three main ways: using algorithms to determine responses to requests for information, using algorithms to provide personalized recommendations and enable “hyper-nudging,” and using AI-generated content to prompt emotional responses and thus drive behavior. Each of these approaches is then applied to the context of philanthropy through the lens of three groups of actors that play significant roles in our online giving decisions: general-purpose search and recommendation services, giving platforms, and individual cause-based organizations. We argue that AI could play a significant role in encouraging people to give, and in influencing how they give. However, there are also potentially significant risks and ethical concerns associated with doing so. We identify these risks and concerns and suggest actions that can be taken to mitigate them when using AI to shape the giving choices of individual donors.

Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.