Expansion Cohorts in Phase 1 Oncology Trials: A Systematic Review of Their Design, Implementation, and Outcomes

Abstract<br/>The urgent need for drug development for cancer patients and the complexity of novel therapies have led to the increasing importance of expansion cohorts (EC) within phase 1 trial design. <br/>We conducted a systematic review of oncology phase 1 trials with EC published from 2019 to 2023. The objective was to assess the characteristics, purpose and outcomes of EC. A mixed-effects meta-regression model was conducted to analyse response rates.<br/>479 published phase 1 trials with EC were included (median number of EC patients per trial: 27). The EC objective was stated in 55.7% of studies (76.8% safety, 16.5% dosing, 25.8% pharmacokinetics, 22.1% pharmacodynamics, 77.5% preliminary efficacy). 117 trials (24.4%) included a statistical justification plan. The mean Overall Response Rate (ORR) was 20.2% in solid tumours and 46.8% in haematological malignancies. Among drug classes, Antibody-drug conjugates showed the highest ORR (32.1%). Higher ORR was significantly associated with combination therapies, haematological trials, trials with statistical justification for EC sample size, and trials not containing Immunotherapy.<br/>EC have evolved to become large dynamic studies assessing both preliminary efficacy and safety. This study highlights the importance of clearly stated EC objectives and sample size justification to enhance the rigour and interpretability of early-phase evidence. <br/>

Publication Details

Journal
Research Explorer (The University of Manchester)
Published
2025-10-27
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Expansion Cohorts in Phase 1 Oncology Trials: A Systematic Review of Their Design, Implementation, and Outcomes

Research Explorer (The University of Manchester)
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
article

Expansion Cohorts in Phase 1 Oncology Trials: A Systematic Review of Their Design, Implementation, and Outcomes

article en

Abstract

Abstract<br/>The urgent need for drug development for cancer patients and the complexity of novel therapies have led to the increasing importance of expansion cohorts (EC) within phase 1 trial design. <br/>We conducted a systematic review of oncology phase 1 trials with EC published from 2019 to 2023. The objective was to assess the characteristics, purpose and outcomes of EC. A mixed-effects meta-regression model was conducted to analyse response rates.<br/>479 published phase 1 trials with EC were included (median number of EC patients per trial: 27). The EC objective was stated in 55.7% of studies (76.8% safety, 16.5% dosing, 25.8% pharmacokinetics, 22.1% pharmacodynamics, 77.5% preliminary efficacy). 117 trials (24.4%) included a statistical justification plan. The mean Overall Response Rate (ORR) was 20.2% in solid tumours and 46.8% in haematological malignancies. Among drug classes, Antibody-drug conjugates showed the highest ORR (32.1%). Higher ORR was significantly associated with combination therapies, haematological trials, trials with statistical justification for EC sample size, and trials not containing Immunotherapy.<br/>EC have evolved to become large dynamic studies assessing both preliminary efficacy and safety. This study highlights the importance of clearly stated EC objectives and sample size justification to enhance the rigour and interpretability of early-phase evidence. <br/>

Research Explorer (The University of Manchester)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.