Exploring the Organizational Paradox/International Business/Turbulence-Trio. Common Grounds, Crises, and Challenges
This chapter explores the intersection of organizational paradox theory and international business (IB), emphasizing its value for navigating the complexity, uncertainty, and ambiguity characteristic of today’s global environment. Organizational paradox theory addresses persistent, interdependent tensions—such as global integration versus local responsiveness—that are particularly salient in international contexts. Despite paradox theory’s growing academic recognition and practical impact, its application in IB remains limited but is gaining traction. The chapter argues that adopting a paradox lens—emphasizing both/and thinking rather than either/or trade-offs—can equip international managers to better handle competing demands, especially in volatile and crisis-prone settings. Tools such as the Paradox Quadrant help diagnose, navigate, and balance paradoxes like the global-local tension, offering actionable insights for decision-makers and other organizational actors. The chapter also considers paradox theory’s role in crisis management, highlighting how it fosters resilience, strategic optionality, and learning. However, it cautions against potential pitfalls such as oversimplification, cultural limitations, and practical constraints during extreme crises. Finally, the chapter identifies future research and practice opportunities, particularly in addressing polarization, enhancing context sensitivity, and improving paradoxical communication in international organizations. Ultimately, it presents paradox theory as a complementary framework that deepens understanding and broadens responses to the tensions inherent in global business and management.
Institutions
- Places For People (US)
- Danish Working Environment Authority (DK)
Publication Details
- Journal
- VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet)
- Published
- 2025-09-08
- Primary Topic
- Public Relations and Crisis Communication
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00