Blurring Borders: A Breakdown of China's One-Child Policy and International Adoption Between the United States and China

Since 1992, China has opened its doors to international adoption. In just 32 years, over 160,000 children have been adopted by families from countries worldwide. Yet, in September 2024, the country announced that it would be halting foreign adoption work, the only exception being "the adoption of a child or stepchild of blood relatives of the same generation who are within three generations of foreigners coming to china to adopt." According to records from the U.S. Department of State, the U.S. has been the largest receiving country of Chinese adoptees. This paper will first explore the history of Chinese domestic policy, which has resulted in a consistently high number of adoptions from China to the U.S., including the role of Malthusian theories, family planning campaigns in the 1970s, and the one-child policy. Then, the focus will shift towards the implications of China's recent decision to stop foreign adoption work on U.S.-China relations. Specifically, the second section will explore how the process of intercountry adoption has produced an unforeseen connection between the U.S. and China, and the consequences of terminating that connection. It will demonstrate how the connection between these countries began with individuals and gradually trickled up to leaders at the national level, ultimately softening the reputations of the U.S. and China to each other's citizens.

Publication Details

Journal
Open Access Journals at BC (Boston College)
Published
2025-12-04
Primary Topic
Child Welfare and Adoption
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Blurring Borders: A Breakdown of China's One-Child Policy and International Adoption Between the United States and China

Open Access Journals at BC (Boston College)
Child Welfare and Adoption
article

Blurring Borders: A Breakdown of China's One-Child Policy and International Adoption Between the United States and China

article en

Abstract

Since 1992, China has opened its doors to international adoption. In just 32 years, over 160,000 children have been adopted by families from countries worldwide. Yet, in September 2024, the country announced that it would be halting foreign adoption work, the only exception being "the adoption of a child or stepchild of blood relatives of the same generation who are within three generations of foreigners coming to china to adopt." According to records from the U.S. Department of State, the U.S. has been the largest receiving country of Chinese adoptees. This paper will first explore the history of Chinese domestic policy, which has resulted in a consistently high number of adoptions from China to the U.S., including the role of Malthusian theories, family planning campaigns in the 1970s, and the one-child policy. Then, the focus will shift towards the implications of China's recent decision to stop foreign adoption work on U.S.-China relations. Specifically, the second section will explore how the process of intercountry adoption has produced an unforeseen connection between the U.S. and China, and the consequences of terminating that connection. It will demonstrate how the connection between these countries began with individuals and gradually trickled up to leaders at the national level, ultimately softening the reputations of the U.S. and China to each other's citizens.

Open Access Journals at BC (Boston College)
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Child Welfare and Adoption
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.