Finding an Effective Measure of Religiosity and Substance Use Levels for the Deaf: An Attempted Pilot Study

The Deaf often lack access to health-promoting services (Meador & Zazove, 2005), though they have an increased risk of developing substance use disorders (Hommes et al., 2018). Communication has been a prominent barrier to the accessibility of healthcare services and participation in research for the Deaf (McKee et al., 2012). Literature has shown multiple methodological challenges when conducting research with the Deaf (Napier et al., 2018). This pilot study used Jones et al.’s (2001) cross-cultural translation model to translate two measures into American Sign Language (ASL). Six bilingual experts in ASL and English translated the RSAS-5 and the TAPS into unstructured ASL Gloss. Due to the small sample size (n= 3), the analyses were not run. Instead, incidents that occurred are discussed from a qualitative perspective. This study suggests that a prominent barrier to conducting research with the Deaf is the lack of trust between hearing researchers and the Deaf.

Publication Details

Journal
Digital Commons - East Tennessee State University (East Tennessee State University)
Published
2025-05-01
Primary Topic
Hearing Impairment and Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Finding an Effective Measure of Religiosity and Substance Use Levels for the Deaf: An Attempted Pilot Study

Digital Commons - East Tennessee State University (East Tennessee State University)
Hearing Impairment and Communication
article

Finding an Effective Measure of Religiosity and Substance Use Levels for the Deaf: An Attempted Pilot Study

article en

Abstract

The Deaf often lack access to health-promoting services (Meador & Zazove, 2005), though they have an increased risk of developing substance use disorders (Hommes et al., 2018). Communication has been a prominent barrier to the accessibility of healthcare services and participation in research for the Deaf (McKee et al., 2012). Literature has shown multiple methodological challenges when conducting research with the Deaf (Napier et al., 2018). This pilot study used Jones et al.’s (2001) cross-cultural translation model to translate two measures into American Sign Language (ASL). Six bilingual experts in ASL and English translated the RSAS-5 and the TAPS into unstructured ASL Gloss. Due to the small sample size (n= 3), the analyses were not run. Instead, incidents that occurred are discussed from a qualitative perspective. This study suggests that a prominent barrier to conducting research with the Deaf is the lack of trust between hearing researchers and the Deaf.

Digital Commons - East Tennessee State University (East Tennessee State University)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Hearing Impairment and Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.