Optimization of austenitic and ferritic steels for deep drawing

Deep drawing of stainless steels thin sheets is a cold forming process used to produce components with complex geometries at limited costs. Although it seems a simple shaping technique, this technology requires a high level of know-how, essential to optimize parameters and limit production scraps. The choice of stainless steel type also plays a fundamental role, since there are austenitic and ferritic grades with improved chemical composition which should be characterized by a superior deformability when compared to the more common ones. This study investigates the formability of two austenitic and two ferritic stainless steels, AISI 304, 304 mod., AISI 430 and AISI 441, using tensile tests and Erichsen tests. From the former, the mechanical properties and anisotropy coefficients were determined along three sampling directions in respect to the rolling direction. Since the deep drawing is influenced also by some technological parameters such as the lubrication, the punch speed, and the blank-holder pressure, Erichsen tests were performed varying the deformation conditions and an Erichsen index (IE) was determined. The Erichsen samples were also subjected to metallographic and HV0.2 microhardness analyses to study the modification of the microstructure and the consequent impact on the local mechanical properties.

Publication Details

Published
2025-10-01
Primary Topic
Metal Forming Simulation Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimization of austenitic and ferritic steels for deep drawing

Metal Forming Simulation Techniques
article

Optimization of austenitic and ferritic steels for deep drawing

article en

Abstract

Deep drawing of stainless steels thin sheets is a cold forming process used to produce components with complex geometries at limited costs. Although it seems a simple shaping technique, this technology requires a high level of know-how, essential to optimize parameters and limit production scraps. The choice of stainless steel type also plays a fundamental role, since there are austenitic and ferritic grades with improved chemical composition which should be characterized by a superior deformability when compared to the more common ones. This study investigates the formability of two austenitic and two ferritic stainless steels, AISI 304, 304 mod., AISI 430 and AISI 441, using tensile tests and Erichsen tests. From the former, the mechanical properties and anisotropy coefficients were determined along three sampling directions in respect to the rolling direction. Since the deep drawing is influenced also by some technological parameters such as the lubrication, the punch speed, and the blank-holder pressure, Erichsen tests were performed varying the deformation conditions and an Erichsen index (IE) was determined. The Erichsen samples were also subjected to metallographic and HV0.2 microhardness analyses to study the modification of the microstructure and the consequent impact on the local mechanical properties.

Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Metal Forming Simulation Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.