Validation of the Sexual Inhibition/Sexual Excitation Scales with Sexual Arousal Measures in Men

Objective. To provide validity evidence for the Spanish version of the Sexual Inhibition/Sexual Excitation Scales(SIS/SES) by examining the associations between its dimensions and self-reported and laboratory-based measuresof sexual arousal. Method. The sample comprised 72 Spanish men aged 18-30 years, of whom 50% reportedpredominantly heterosexual behavior and 50% reported predominantly gay behavior. Participants completedthe SIS/SES and measures of sexual functioning (sexual arousal and erection) and sexual arousal assessed in alaboratory setting (rating of sexual arousal, rating of genital sensations, and genital response). Pearson correlationanalyses were conducted to examine associations between continuous scores of the four SIS/SES dimensions:Sexual excitation (SES), Sexual inhibition due to the threat of performance failure (SIS1), Sexual inhibition dueto the risk of being caught during sexual activity (SIS2), and Sexual inhibition due to the threat of performanceconsequences (SIS3). Additional comparisons across tertile groups were conducted to facilitate the interpretationof significant associations. Results. SES scores were positively associated with ratings of sexual arousal in thelaboratory, whereas SIS1 scores were negatively associated with genital response. No significant associations wereobserved for SIS2 or SIS3. Tertile-based analyses supported the association between SIS1 and genital response, butdid not reveal significant differences in ratings of sexual arousal across SES groups. Conclusions. The findingsprovide partial validity evidence for the Spanish version of the SIS/SES. Specifically, the results support therelevance of SES for subjective sexual arousal and of SIS1 for physiological sexual responding. These findingscontribute to the understanding of the differential role of sexual excitation and inhibition in male sexual response.

Publication Details

Journal
International journal of psychological research
Published
2026-11-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.7841
Primary Topic
Sexual function and dysfunction studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Validation of the Sexual Inhibition/Sexual Excitation Scales with Sexual Arousal Measures in Men

International journal of psychological research
Sexual function and dysfunction studies
article

Validation of the Sexual Inhibition/Sexual Excitation Scales with Sexual Arousal Measures in Men

article en

Abstract

Objective. To provide validity evidence for the Spanish version of the Sexual Inhibition/Sexual Excitation Scales(SIS/SES) by examining the associations between its dimensions and self-reported and laboratory-based measuresof sexual arousal. Method. The sample comprised 72 Spanish men aged 18-30 years, of whom 50% reportedpredominantly heterosexual behavior and 50% reported predominantly gay behavior. Participants completedthe SIS/SES and measures of sexual functioning (sexual arousal and erection) and sexual arousal assessed in alaboratory setting (rating of sexual arousal, rating of genital sensations, and genital response). Pearson correlationanalyses were conducted to examine associations between continuous scores of the four SIS/SES dimensions:Sexual excitation (SES), Sexual inhibition due to the threat of performance failure (SIS1), Sexual inhibition dueto the risk of being caught during sexual activity (SIS2), and Sexual inhibition due to the threat of performanceconsequences (SIS3). Additional comparisons across tertile groups were conducted to facilitate the interpretationof significant associations. Results. SES scores were positively associated with ratings of sexual arousal in thelaboratory, whereas SIS1 scores were negatively associated with genital response. No significant associations wereobserved for SIS2 or SIS3. Tertile-based analyses supported the association between SIS1 and genital response, butdid not reveal significant differences in ratings of sexual arousal across SES groups. Conclusions. The findingsprovide partial validity evidence for the Spanish version of the SIS/SES. Specifically, the results support therelevance of SES for subjective sexual arousal and of SIS1 for physiological sexual responding. These findingscontribute to the understanding of the differential role of sexual excitation and inhibition in male sexual response.

International journal of psychological researchVol. 19(2)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 99%
Sexual function and dysfunction studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon