The Laws of Public Data Gaps

One of the most significant developments in the digitalisation and automation of government infrastructure is that the capacity of officials to collect, with minimal costs, valuable data on the performance, users, and impacts of public services is increasing exponentially. Public law thought tends to view this growing capacity through a concern about over-collection and misuse of the public’s data, with privacy and the protection of data being a particular anxiety. But there is also an opposite problem that has generally been neglected by public lawyers: it is still the case that public sector organisations routinely do not collect, in many areas, even the most basic data on the operation and impact of public services. This chapter, which grounds its discussion in the UK context, argues that these ‘public data gaps’ are not only a significant and growing problem of modern digital governance, but they are also a problem with distinctly legal dimensions. The chapter provides a new conceptualisation of the nature, causes, and harms of public data gaps before demonstrating how the problem raises questions for a range of important ideas in public law, including rationality and equality, access to justice, data protection and privacy, and duties of record-keeping and disclosure. Ultimately, alongside and as a part of the increasingly sophisticated legal analysis of the problems of government collecting too much data, we suggest the field ought to develop much more nuanced thinking around the laws of public data gaps.

Publication Details

Journal
Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham)
Published
2025-11-27
Primary Topic
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Laws of Public Data Gaps

Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham)
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
article

The Laws of Public Data Gaps

article en

Abstract

One of the most significant developments in the digitalisation and automation of government infrastructure is that the capacity of officials to collect, with minimal costs, valuable data on the performance, users, and impacts of public services is increasing exponentially. Public law thought tends to view this growing capacity through a concern about over-collection and misuse of the public’s data, with privacy and the protection of data being a particular anxiety. But there is also an opposite problem that has generally been neglected by public lawyers: it is still the case that public sector organisations routinely do not collect, in many areas, even the most basic data on the operation and impact of public services. This chapter, which grounds its discussion in the UK context, argues that these ‘public data gaps’ are not only a significant and growing problem of modern digital governance, but they are also a problem with distinctly legal dimensions. The chapter provides a new conceptualisation of the nature, causes, and harms of public data gaps before demonstrating how the problem raises questions for a range of important ideas in public law, including rationality and equality, access to justice, data protection and privacy, and duties of record-keeping and disclosure. Ultimately, alongside and as a part of the increasingly sophisticated legal analysis of the problems of government collecting too much data, we suggest the field ought to develop much more nuanced thinking around the laws of public data gaps.

Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham)
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.