Political Activism in the Courts from the Public Order Act 1986 to the Public Order Act 2023:Repression and Resistance

This article analyses the development and legacy of public order legislation with respect to collective action in the UK. We identify two recurring and interconnected themes. First, successive public order Acts have reacted to waves of protest by expanding the scope of what is deemed a threat, shifting the focus from violence to disruption. The most recent Acts redefine disruptive protest as a form of social harm. Second, this extension of state power has been accompanied by a steady constriction of the courtroom as a space for resistance. While the use of law as a repressive tool inevitably produces a dialectical effect, as those targeted develop new networks, means, and spaces of resistance, the formal legal avenues for activists to justify their actions are now highly circumscribed. The courtroom, therefore, remains a critical but increasingly challenging arena where the democratic case for protest is continually asserted.

Publication Details

Journal
University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham)
Published
2025-12-04
Primary Topic
Law in Society and Culture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Political Activism in the Courts from the Public Order Act 1986 to the Public Order Act 2023:Repression and Resistance

University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham)
Law in Society and Culture
article

Political Activism in the Courts from the Public Order Act 1986 to the Public Order Act 2023:Repression and Resistance

article en

Abstract

This article analyses the development and legacy of public order legislation with respect to collective action in the UK. We identify two recurring and interconnected themes. First, successive public order Acts have reacted to waves of protest by expanding the scope of what is deemed a threat, shifting the focus from violence to disruption. The most recent Acts redefine disruptive protest as a form of social harm. Second, this extension of state power has been accompanied by a steady constriction of the courtroom as a space for resistance. While the use of law as a repressive tool inevitably produces a dialectical effect, as those targeted develop new networks, means, and spaces of resistance, the formal legal avenues for activists to justify their actions are now highly circumscribed. The courtroom, therefore, remains a critical but increasingly challenging arena where the democratic case for protest is continually asserted.

University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Law in Society and Culture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.