Does this work here? Evaluation and evidence for local industrial strategy and policy

The successful implementation of industrial strategies relies on high-quality evidence of interventions that work. Yet, there is a lack of such evidence, particularly for local and regional economic policy. While policymakers at all levels of government express a strong desire for better evidence, limited research has addressed the question of why more resources are not devoted to producing better evidence. This article identifies barriers to more and better evaluation of industrial and economic policy more generally. This is a pertinent question in the UK context as a new industrial strategy is launched, while local government is undergoing a reorganisation with new powers for economic policy being devolved. The article makes two contributions. First, it argues that evaluation and evidence should be treated as a public good that will be underprovided without deliberate investment. Second, the lack of a strong ecosystem for evaluation at the local level is identified, which could act as a flexible resource to improve evaluation capacity and capability and support the use of existing evidence. Implications for the design of incentives and institutions for evaluation are considered.

Publication Details

Journal
London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science)
Published
2025-10-31
Primary Topic
Regional Development and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does this work here? Evaluation and evidence for local industrial strategy and policy

London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science)
Regional Development and Policy
article

Does this work here? Evaluation and evidence for local industrial strategy and policy

article en

Abstract

The successful implementation of industrial strategies relies on high-quality evidence of interventions that work. Yet, there is a lack of such evidence, particularly for local and regional economic policy. While policymakers at all levels of government express a strong desire for better evidence, limited research has addressed the question of why more resources are not devoted to producing better evidence. This article identifies barriers to more and better evaluation of industrial and economic policy more generally. This is a pertinent question in the UK context as a new industrial strategy is launched, while local government is undergoing a reorganisation with new powers for economic policy being devolved. The article makes two contributions. First, it argues that evaluation and evidence should be treated as a public good that will be underprovided without deliberate investment. Second, the lack of a strong ecosystem for evaluation at the local level is identified, which could act as a flexible resource to improve evaluation capacity and capability and support the use of existing evidence. Implications for the design of incentives and institutions for evaluation are considered.

London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science)
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Regional Development and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.