On the Recapturing of Possibilities Lost: Technology, Potentialisation and Psychotechnics

As the modern politico-economic system of nationalistically organised capitalism was crashing into the crisis of the two World Wars, a keen awareness grew amongst philosophers and social theorists about a) the fragmented and contradictory condition of humanity’s self-knowledge, and b) the ambivalent role of technoscience. A direct connection was observed between the collapse of self-knowledge and the triumphant advance of technoscience: the more the material world was placed at humanity’s disposal by technology, the less was humanity ready or competent to grasp and manage these new powers. In the second half of the 20th century the conviction grew that self-knowledge and cognitive insight can themselves be manipulated technologically by altering biochemical structures and processes or augmenting with AI and cybernetics. But ‘psychotechnics’ need not be understood exclusively on this model (i.e. of technological manipulations to ‘humaneer’ the capacities considered lacking). Under the header of ‘potentialisation technologies’ we discuss the nature, development, and pros and cons, of a form of psychotechnics that is oriented directly toward subjectivity and the expansion of possibilities.

Publication Details

Journal
Open Research Online (The Open University)
Published
2025-10-16
Primary Topic
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On the Recapturing of Possibilities Lost: Technology, Potentialisation and Psychotechnics

Open Research Online (The Open University)
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
article

On the Recapturing of Possibilities Lost: Technology, Potentialisation and Psychotechnics

article en

Abstract

As the modern politico-economic system of nationalistically organised capitalism was crashing into the crisis of the two World Wars, a keen awareness grew amongst philosophers and social theorists about a) the fragmented and contradictory condition of humanity’s self-knowledge, and b) the ambivalent role of technoscience. A direct connection was observed between the collapse of self-knowledge and the triumphant advance of technoscience: the more the material world was placed at humanity’s disposal by technology, the less was humanity ready or competent to grasp and manage these new powers. In the second half of the 20th century the conviction grew that self-knowledge and cognitive insight can themselves be manipulated technologically by altering biochemical structures and processes or augmenting with AI and cybernetics. But ‘psychotechnics’ need not be understood exclusively on this model (i.e. of technological manipulations to ‘humaneer’ the capacities considered lacking). Under the header of ‘potentialisation technologies’ we discuss the nature, development, and pros and cons, of a form of psychotechnics that is oriented directly toward subjectivity and the expansion of possibilities.

Open Research Online (The Open University)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.