Coda. Utopia, dystopia and denialism::The making of science in between a professional endeavour and a marketplace

This Coda explores the causes of denialism by turning the attention towards what happens inside and around the university and the making of science. The making of science is made of rituals which define our identity as researchers and is intrinsically related to inquiries into what we do not know and many never know. Scientists define these rituals in a network of actors, a network that has been expanding since the printing revolution to now includes university and journal rankings, professional and popular press, social media, to name but a few. This shift has consequences. I investigate these consequences and argue that the science and researchers now pursue means (e.g. legitimating resources) which have become ends in themselves. Scientists are culprit in this shift and profit from it. The result is a subtle but pervasive change in the purpose of scientific research and its legitimacy.

Publication Details

Journal
Research Explorer (The University of Manchester)
Published
2025-08-24
Primary Topic
Digital Education and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Coda. Utopia, dystopia and denialism::The making of science in between a professional endeavour and a marketplace

Research Explorer (The University of Manchester)
Digital Education and Society
article

Coda. Utopia, dystopia and denialism::The making of science in between a professional endeavour and a marketplace

article en

Abstract

This Coda explores the causes of denialism by turning the attention towards what happens inside and around the university and the making of science. The making of science is made of rituals which define our identity as researchers and is intrinsically related to inquiries into what we do not know and many never know. Scientists define these rituals in a network of actors, a network that has been expanding since the printing revolution to now includes university and journal rankings, professional and popular press, social media, to name but a few. This shift has consequences. I investigate these consequences and argue that the science and researchers now pursue means (e.g. legitimating resources) which have become ends in themselves. Scientists are culprit in this shift and profit from it. The result is a subtle but pervasive change in the purpose of scientific research and its legitimacy.

Research Explorer (The University of Manchester)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Digital Education and Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.