Effects of teaching neuroplasticity on motivation, inhibitory control andtask performance, and the role of mindset theory

Background: Frequent and persistent errors resist teaching, partly due to difficulties in mobilizing inhibitory control. A promising strategy to address this challenge involves teaching students about neuroplasticity. Such instruction may indeed foster motivational beliefs (often referred to as growth mindset), which in turn could positively influence the mobilization of inhibitory control. This study investigated the effects of a neuroplasticity- based intervention on motivation (including constructs from mindset theory), inhibitory control and task performance. Method: The final sample included 44 10–12 y/o students recruited from French-speaking elementary schools in the Montreal area (Qu´ ebec, Canada), primarily through an online advertisement posted on social media. They were assigned to either the experimental group (neuroplasticity intervention) or the control group. They completed a motivational questionnaire at both pretest and posttest and performed a fraction comparison task while undergoing fMRI scanning. Results: Results indicated that students who learned about neuroplasticity demonstrated significant improvements in motivation and greater activation of the ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (VLPFC), a brain region associated with inhibitory control. However, task performance did not significantly differ between groups. Notably, the change in perceived competence was the only motivational variable significantly associated with brain activity related to inhibitory control. Conclusions: These findings suggest that teaching neuroplasticity can both foster motivation and neural engagement, with perceived competence emerging as a central variable in this relationship. While the intervention did not produce direct effects on academic performance, it remains a promising cost-effective strategy to support students with inhibitory control difficulties and offers valuable insights for future educational interventions.

Publication Details

Journal
Archipelago (University of Quebec in Montreal)
Published
2025-05-24
Primary Topic
Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of teaching neuroplasticity on motivation, inhibitory control andtask performance, and the role of mindset theory

Archipelago (University of Quebec in Montreal)
Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
article

Effects of teaching neuroplasticity on motivation, inhibitory control andtask performance, and the role of mindset theory

article en

Abstract

Background: Frequent and persistent errors resist teaching, partly due to difficulties in mobilizing inhibitory control. A promising strategy to address this challenge involves teaching students about neuroplasticity. Such instruction may indeed foster motivational beliefs (often referred to as growth mindset), which in turn could positively influence the mobilization of inhibitory control. This study investigated the effects of a neuroplasticity- based intervention on motivation (including constructs from mindset theory), inhibitory control and task performance. Method: The final sample included 44 10–12 y/o students recruited from French-speaking elementary schools in the Montreal area (Qu´ ebec, Canada), primarily through an online advertisement posted on social media. They were assigned to either the experimental group (neuroplasticity intervention) or the control group. They completed a motivational questionnaire at both pretest and posttest and performed a fraction comparison task while undergoing fMRI scanning. Results: Results indicated that students who learned about neuroplasticity demonstrated significant improvements in motivation and greater activation of the ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (VLPFC), a brain region associated with inhibitory control. However, task performance did not significantly differ between groups. Notably, the change in perceived competence was the only motivational variable significantly associated with brain activity related to inhibitory control. Conclusions: These findings suggest that teaching neuroplasticity can both foster motivation and neural engagement, with perceived competence emerging as a central variable in this relationship. While the intervention did not produce direct effects on academic performance, it remains a promising cost-effective strategy to support students with inhibitory control difficulties and offers valuable insights for future educational interventions.

Archipelago (University of Quebec in Montreal)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Effects of teaching neuroplasticity on motivation, inhibitory control andtask performance, and the role of mindset theory · Archipelago (University of Quebec in Montreal) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS