The Moderating Role of Social Support for LGBTQ People in South Central Appalachia: Present Yet Unimpactful?

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) minority stress theory states that LGBTQ people experience stressors specific to their identity that result in negative mental health outcomes. Social support has been shown to protect against these negative outcomes, but South Central Appalachia is known to be high stigma and low resource for this population. The present study examined the potential moderating impact of four sources of social support (family, friends, partners, and pets) on the relationship between minority stress experiences and psychological distress for LGBTQ people living in South Central Appalachia. Participants included 116 LGBTQ adults living in South Central Appalachia who completed survey-based self-report measures. A series of moderated linear regression models were utilized, and results indicated that there was no moderating effect by any support sources tested. Possible explanations are addressed, and further research is needed to investigate the role of social support in this population.

Publication Details

Journal
Digital Commons - East Tennessee State University (East Tennessee State University)
Published
2025-05-01
Primary Topic
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Moderating Role of Social Support for LGBTQ People in South Central Appalachia: Present Yet Unimpactful?

Digital Commons - East Tennessee State University (East Tennessee State University)
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
article

The Moderating Role of Social Support for LGBTQ People in South Central Appalachia: Present Yet Unimpactful?

article en

Abstract

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) minority stress theory states that LGBTQ people experience stressors specific to their identity that result in negative mental health outcomes. Social support has been shown to protect against these negative outcomes, but South Central Appalachia is known to be high stigma and low resource for this population. The present study examined the potential moderating impact of four sources of social support (family, friends, partners, and pets) on the relationship between minority stress experiences and psychological distress for LGBTQ people living in South Central Appalachia. Participants included 116 LGBTQ adults living in South Central Appalachia who completed survey-based self-report measures. A series of moderated linear regression models were utilized, and results indicated that there was no moderating effect by any support sources tested. Possible explanations are addressed, and further research is needed to investigate the role of social support in this population.

Digital Commons - East Tennessee State University (East Tennessee State University)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Moderating Role of Social Support for LGBTQ People in South Central Appalachia: Present Yet Unimpactful? · Digital Commons - East Tennessee State University (East Tennessee State University) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS