Finding the public in public trust: A bottom-up study of trust in politicians and government agencies

In this study we undertake a novel, bottom-up approach to the measurement and study of public trust. Reflecting recent calls for trust research to ‘pay greater attention to the way trust is expressed by individuals’ (Syed 2024: 7), we conducted telephone interviews of a representative sample of 1200 Australians, qualitatively measuring what trust means to them, and their reasons for trusting politicians and government agencies. Through our analysis of their responses, we make three important contributions to the public trust literature. First, allowing respondents to express trust in their own words highlights a richer array of drivers of trust than is often presented in public trust research. Second, we reveal systematic differences in the way respondents evaluate the trustworthiness of different public trust objects (politicians compared to government agencies), underscoring the need for greater nuance in the way public trust is conceptualised. Third, we use the first two insights to examine opportunities to refine the measurement of public trust to better reflect the intricacies of the way citizens think about political actors.

Publication Details

Journal
Bond University Research Portal (Bond University)
Published
2025-11-27
Primary Topic
Social Capital and Networks
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Finding the public in public trust: A bottom-up study of trust in politicians and government agencies

Bond University Research Portal (Bond University)
Social Capital and Networks
article

Finding the public in public trust: A bottom-up study of trust in politicians and government agencies

article en

Abstract

In this study we undertake a novel, bottom-up approach to the measurement and study of public trust. Reflecting recent calls for trust research to ‘pay greater attention to the way trust is expressed by individuals’ (Syed 2024: 7), we conducted telephone interviews of a representative sample of 1200 Australians, qualitatively measuring what trust means to them, and their reasons for trusting politicians and government agencies. Through our analysis of their responses, we make three important contributions to the public trust literature. First, allowing respondents to express trust in their own words highlights a richer array of drivers of trust than is often presented in public trust research. Second, we reveal systematic differences in the way respondents evaluate the trustworthiness of different public trust objects (politicians compared to government agencies), underscoring the need for greater nuance in the way public trust is conceptualised. Third, we use the first two insights to examine opportunities to refine the measurement of public trust to better reflect the intricacies of the way citizens think about political actors.

Bond University Research Portal (Bond University)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Social Capital and Networks
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.