A economia política da incerteza dos fluxos de capitais: Uma reavaliação histórica de Prebisch aos Neo-Dependentistas

The transformation of developing economies, particularly South American, triggered by the post-2008 reversal of international capital flows and the subsequent expansion of their financial sectors has implied a resurgence in the popu-larity of what we might call a neo-dependentist approach, focusing on the concept of financial subordination. This approach, while convincing on the theoretical and analytical planes, has revealed some controversial implications. By emphasising the role of external constraints on developing economies, the pivotal role of financial subordination implicitly limits the space for possible reforms at regional, subregional, and national levels to mitigate the effects of the uncertainty associated with international capital flows. Drawing from the history of economic thought, we consider the numerous analogies between the financial subordination approach and Latin American Structuralism and Raul Prebisch, particularly in the field of political economy. A careful reappraisal of Prebisch’s (self-critical) last book can provide interesting insights into the current problems.

Publication Details

Journal
Conicet
Published
2024-12-01
Primary Topic
Economic Theory and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A economia política da incerteza dos fluxos de capitais: Uma reavaliação histórica de Prebisch aos Neo-Dependentistas

Conicet
Economic Theory and Policy
article

A economia política da incerteza dos fluxos de capitais: Uma reavaliação histórica de Prebisch aos Neo-Dependentistas

article en

Abstract

The transformation of developing economies, particularly South American, triggered by the post-2008 reversal of international capital flows and the subsequent expansion of their financial sectors has implied a resurgence in the popu-larity of what we might call a neo-dependentist approach, focusing on the concept of financial subordination. This approach, while convincing on the theoretical and analytical planes, has revealed some controversial implications. By emphasising the role of external constraints on developing economies, the pivotal role of financial subordination implicitly limits the space for possible reforms at regional, subregional, and national levels to mitigate the effects of the uncertainty associated with international capital flows. Drawing from the history of economic thought, we consider the numerous analogies between the financial subordination approach and Latin American Structuralism and Raul Prebisch, particularly in the field of political economy. A careful reappraisal of Prebisch’s (self-critical) last book can provide interesting insights into the current problems.

Conicet
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Economic Theory and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.