Impact of the Perceived System Bias and Type of AI Explanations on Decision-Making Effectiveness in Explainable AI Systems: Cognitive and Emotional Mechanisms

Artificial intelligence (AI)-based decision-making systems have been shown to outperform humans. However, in critical decision-making domains like healthcare, human decision-makers often mistrust and are reluctant to follow the recommendations of black-box AI systems because they perceive the system to be biased. This study aims to advance AI for social good by illuminating the mechanisms by which perceived bias in AI systems affects users’ decision-making effectiveness and how different explanation types mitigate these effects. Drawing from Dual-Process Theory and Theory of Effective Use, we propose two mechanisms that mediate the effects of perceived system bias in explainable AI systems: a cognitive mechanism of learning and an emotional mechanism of anticipated regret. Our study found that the cognitive mechanism of learning primarily mediates the relationship between perceived system bias and decision-making effectiveness, and feature importance explanations mitigate the negative effects of perceived system bias more effectively than counterfactual explanations.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
IT University Of Copenhagen (IT University of Copenhagen)
Published
2025-08-08
Primary Topic
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of the Perceived System Bias and Type of AI Explanations on Decision-Making Effectiveness in Explainable AI Systems: Cognitive and Emotional Mechanisms

IT University Of Copenhagen (IT University of Copenhagen)
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
article

Impact of the Perceived System Bias and Type of AI Explanations on Decision-Making Effectiveness in Explainable AI Systems: Cognitive and Emotional Mechanisms

article en

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI)-based decision-making systems have been shown to outperform humans. However, in critical decision-making domains like healthcare, human decision-makers often mistrust and are reluctant to follow the recommendations of black-box AI systems because they perceive the system to be biased. This study aims to advance AI for social good by illuminating the mechanisms by which perceived bias in AI systems affects users’ decision-making effectiveness and how different explanation types mitigate these effects. Drawing from Dual-Process Theory and Theory of Effective Use, we propose two mechanisms that mediate the effects of perceived system bias in explainable AI systems: a cognitive mechanism of learning and an emotional mechanism of anticipated regret. Our study found that the cognitive mechanism of learning primarily mediates the relationship between perceived system bias and decision-making effectiveness, and feature importance explanations mitigate the negative effects of perceived system bias more effectively than counterfactual explanations.

IT University Of Copenhagen (IT University of Copenhagen)
Baylor University (US), Georgia State University (US), Digital Science (United States) (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Impact of the Perceived System Bias and Type of AI Explanations on Decision-Making Effectiveness in Explainable AI Systems: Cognitive and Emotional Mechanisms · IT University Of Copenhagen (IT University of Copenhagen) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS