AI Risk Management

This case study responds to the necessity of risk management in AI development as technologies increasingly come to characterize society. It begins by contrasting the hype of AI—promises of abundance and civilization-altering automation—with the reality of systems that too frequently inflict harm, ranging from biased sentencing algorithms to dangerous user-facing chatbots. The article introduces the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) AI Risk Management Framework, a voluntary framework of practices to help organizations map, measure, manage, and govern AI risks. Through the example of the Richmond, Virginia city government, the case illustrates how the use of the framework can reveal gaps in oversight, stakeholder engagement, and bias testing, especially when AI is developed outside the organization. It also brings to the fore the political, economic, and cultural dilemmas of establishing good governance, as critics argue that regulation stifles innovation and intrudes into personal choice. The paper sets these tensions within the context of new technologies in general, describing how the Collingridge Dilemma makes intervention early on difficult and intervention late on all but impossible. Lastly, it challenges students to wonder whether a society driven by rapid AI innovation can balance innovation with safety, fairness, and human dignity—and to consider what responsible AI would look like in action.

Publication Details

Journal
VTechWorks (Virginia Tech)
Published
2025-06-16
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI Risk Management

VTechWorks (Virginia Tech)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

AI Risk Management

article en

Abstract

This case study responds to the necessity of risk management in AI development as technologies increasingly come to characterize society. It begins by contrasting the hype of AI—promises of abundance and civilization-altering automation—with the reality of systems that too frequently inflict harm, ranging from biased sentencing algorithms to dangerous user-facing chatbots. The article introduces the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) AI Risk Management Framework, a voluntary framework of practices to help organizations map, measure, manage, and govern AI risks. Through the example of the Richmond, Virginia city government, the case illustrates how the use of the framework can reveal gaps in oversight, stakeholder engagement, and bias testing, especially when AI is developed outside the organization. It also brings to the fore the political, economic, and cultural dilemmas of establishing good governance, as critics argue that regulation stifles innovation and intrudes into personal choice. The paper sets these tensions within the context of new technologies in general, describing how the Collingridge Dilemma makes intervention early on difficult and intervention late on all but impossible. Lastly, it challenges students to wonder whether a society driven by rapid AI innovation can balance innovation with safety, fairness, and human dignity—and to consider what responsible AI would look like in action.

VTechWorks (Virginia Tech)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.