The Benefits of Underlining are a Combination of Perceptual and Motor Advantages [abstract]

Underlining is a widely used study technique, but research on its efficacy has been scarce and somewhat inconsistent. This work aimed to explore the role of underlining in word recognition. In Experiment 1, participants were instructed to (1) underline and (2) read words silently and perform a recognition test. Results showed higher recognition for underlined words than those only read in silence. To determine if the perceptual cues (colourfulunderlining) alone, without motor involvement of underlining, are sufficient to enhance memory, Experiment 2 was conducted. Participants (1) read silently underlined words (passive-underlining) and (2) words without underlining. The results showed higher recognition for previously underlined words than nonunderlined words. Finally, in Experiment 3, the impact of motor movement on recognition was examined. Results demonstrated a recognition advantage for words that were only motor-underlined. Together, these results indicate that the benefits of underlining memory depend on perceptual and motor cues.

Publication Details

Journal
Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT)
Published
2024-11-21
Primary Topic
Action Observation and Synchronization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Benefits of Underlining are a Combination of Perceptual and Motor Advantages [abstract]

Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT)
Action Observation and Synchronization
article

The Benefits of Underlining are a Combination of Perceptual and Motor Advantages [abstract]

article en

Abstract

Underlining is a widely used study technique, but research on its efficacy has been scarce and somewhat inconsistent. This work aimed to explore the role of underlining in word recognition. In Experiment 1, participants were instructed to (1) underline and (2) read words silently and perform a recognition test. Results showed higher recognition for underlined words than those only read in silence. To determine if the perceptual cues (colourfulunderlining) alone, without motor involvement of underlining, are sufficient to enhance memory, Experiment 2 was conducted. Participants (1) read silently underlined words (passive-underlining) and (2) words without underlining. The results showed higher recognition for previously underlined words than nonunderlined words. Finally, in Experiment 3, the impact of motor movement on recognition was examined. Results demonstrated a recognition advantage for words that were only motor-underlined. Together, these results indicate that the benefits of underlining memory depend on perceptual and motor cues.

Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Action Observation and Synchronization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.