Framing School Securitization: A Mixed Methods Policy Analysis of The School Violence Prevention Program

This convergent mixed methods policy analysis of the School Violence Prevention Program (SVPP) explores the assumptions that may be driving school securitization, a phenomenon where schools across the country have increasingly invested in security measures and police partnerships despite extensive research evidence demonstrating their use may undermine school cultures most conducive to learning and safety. Using data collected from a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request, guidance from the Office of Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS) which administers the SVPP grant, and data on school district grantees from the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES), I find the program misframes school securitization as an “evidence-based” practice, a claim that grantees implicitly and explicitly adopt. Findings also suggest that school district grantees frame their school security policies in ways that correspond with guidance from law enforcement and other intermediary organizations, as well as in ways that are contextually distinct, but that use race and class-neutral discourses.

Publication Details

Journal
TUScholarShare (Temple University)
Published
2025-05-01
Primary Topic
Education Discipline and Inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Framing School Securitization: A Mixed Methods Policy Analysis of The School Violence Prevention Program

TUScholarShare (Temple University)
Education Discipline and Inequality
article

Framing School Securitization: A Mixed Methods Policy Analysis of The School Violence Prevention Program

article en

Abstract

This convergent mixed methods policy analysis of the School Violence Prevention Program (SVPP) explores the assumptions that may be driving school securitization, a phenomenon where schools across the country have increasingly invested in security measures and police partnerships despite extensive research evidence demonstrating their use may undermine school cultures most conducive to learning and safety. Using data collected from a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request, guidance from the Office of Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS) which administers the SVPP grant, and data on school district grantees from the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES), I find the program misframes school securitization as an “evidence-based” practice, a claim that grantees implicitly and explicitly adopt. Findings also suggest that school district grantees frame their school security policies in ways that correspond with guidance from law enforcement and other intermediary organizations, as well as in ways that are contextually distinct, but that use race and class-neutral discourses.

TUScholarShare (Temple University)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Education Discipline and Inequality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.