Interpretation and Control of AI Model Behavior Through Direct Adjustment of Latent Representations

This dissertation investigates the structures and mechanisms underpinning the latent space representations that emerge within Generative Pretrained Transformer (GPT) models. Addressing the broader goal of enhancing AI trustworthiness through transparency, accountability, and controllability, we focus on techniques to understand, quantify, and manipulate these latent space representations. Through a series of analyses, we examine several chess-playing GPT models as controlled testbeds, leveraging their structured decision space to explore emergent representations and decision-making processes. Key contributions include a mechanistic analysis of the attention heads and latent representations, the development of novel metrics for evaluating intervention outcomes, and the application of linear probe classifiers to decode and edit the model's internal world representations. Analysis of the probe weight vectors reveals that the chess-playing GPT developed an emergent world model of the game that includes pieces, positions, and movement rules, and provides empirical support for the linear representation hypothesis—the idea that abstract concepts are encoded as specific directions in the model's hidden state space. Complementary analysis of the hidden state vectors demonstrates that the model's internal representations honor the Markovian property of chess. Experimental results demonstrate that linear interventions can causally steer GPT outputs while preserving their semantic validity. Drawing on the dose-response analogy from medicine, we vary both the strength and position of interventions, showing that output quality is maximized when intervention strength follows an exponentially decaying schedule across token positions. Similar experiments using sparse autoencoders in place of linear probes yielded significantly poorer performance. These results highlight the effectiveness of simple linear probes as valuable tools for interpretability and control.

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research
Published
2025-08-15
Primary Topic
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interpretation and Control of AI Model Behavior Through Direct Adjustment of Latent Representations

Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
article

Interpretation and Control of AI Model Behavior Through Direct Adjustment of Latent Representations

article en

Abstract

This dissertation investigates the structures and mechanisms underpinning the latent space representations that emerge within Generative Pretrained Transformer (GPT) models. Addressing the broader goal of enhancing AI trustworthiness through transparency, accountability, and controllability, we focus on techniques to understand, quantify, and manipulate these latent space representations. Through a series of analyses, we examine several chess-playing GPT models as controlled testbeds, leveraging their structured decision space to explore emergent representations and decision-making processes. Key contributions include a mechanistic analysis of the attention heads and latent representations, the development of novel metrics for evaluating intervention outcomes, and the application of linear probe classifiers to decode and edit the model's internal world representations. Analysis of the probe weight vectors reveals that the chess-playing GPT developed an emergent world model of the game that includes pieces, positions, and movement rules, and provides empirical support for the linear representation hypothesis—the idea that abstract concepts are encoded as specific directions in the model's hidden state space. Complementary analysis of the hidden state vectors demonstrates that the model's internal representations honor the Markovian property of chess. Experimental results demonstrate that linear interventions can causally steer GPT outputs while preserving their semantic validity. Drawing on the dose-response analogy from medicine, we vary both the strength and position of interventions, showing that output quality is maximized when intervention strength follows an exponentially decaying schedule across token positions. Similar experiments using sparse autoencoders in place of linear probes yielded significantly poorer performance. These results highlight the effectiveness of simple linear probes as valuable tools for interpretability and control.

Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Interpretation and Control of AI Model Behavior Through Direct Adjustment of Latent Representations · Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS