Inclusion in England. Rhetoric or patchy practice?

The UK government has signed up to the various conventions that promote educational inclusion (e.g. The Incheon declaration). Yet the policies around special educational needs send confusing messages with demand for assessment outstripping specialist and segregated resources. The current media panic echoed by politicians is that the SEND system is broken. This makes talk about inclusion seem nothing more than rhetoric. An examination of national statistics will be used to define the problem at a national level and suggest that it is the mainstream system that is broken and in need of attention. In contrast, our research with schools finds some really good practice around inclusion. How can these two positions be reconciled?

Publication Details

Journal
Research Explorer (The University of Manchester)
Published
2025-07-18
Primary Topic
Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Inclusion in England. Rhetoric or patchy practice?

Research Explorer (The University of Manchester)
Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
article

Inclusion in England. Rhetoric or patchy practice?

article en

Abstract

The UK government has signed up to the various conventions that promote educational inclusion (e.g. The Incheon declaration). Yet the policies around special educational needs send confusing messages with demand for assessment outstripping specialist and segregated resources. The current media panic echoed by politicians is that the SEND system is broken. This makes talk about inclusion seem nothing more than rhetoric. An examination of national statistics will be used to define the problem at a national level and suggest that it is the mainstream system that is broken and in need of attention. In contrast, our research with schools finds some really good practice around inclusion. How can these two positions be reconciled?

Research Explorer (The University of Manchester)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Inclusion in England. Rhetoric or patchy practice? · Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS