Factors influencing L2 Tone Perception in Cherokee

Oklahoma Cherokee has six contrastive tones in non-final syllables. This study is an exploratory investigation of the factors affecting the auditory identification, classification, and learning of these six tones by L2 learners with a non-tonal L1 and no prior experience learning Cherokee. In an overt phonological training task, participants identified tones on all non-final syllables of 41 multisyllabic words. The study’s objectives are to (1) assess the relative difficulty of the six tones for learners (2) identify and explain common tone confusions (3) determine effects of linguistic context on identification and (4) determine effects of short-term learning. The results suggest that tones 2, 32, and 4 are easier for learners, while tones 1, 23, and 3 pose greater challenges. When participants’ categorization was inaccurate, they still recognized general pitch contours and pitch levels. Their responses also showed significant learning effects for two tones, as well as effects of tonal context.

Publication Details

Journal
UNM’s Digital Repository (University of New Mexico)
Published
2024-12-15
Primary Topic
Phonetics and Phonology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Factors influencing L2 Tone Perception in Cherokee

UNM’s Digital Repository (University of New Mexico)
Phonetics and Phonology Research
article

Factors influencing L2 Tone Perception in Cherokee

article en

Abstract

Oklahoma Cherokee has six contrastive tones in non-final syllables. This study is an exploratory investigation of the factors affecting the auditory identification, classification, and learning of these six tones by L2 learners with a non-tonal L1 and no prior experience learning Cherokee. In an overt phonological training task, participants identified tones on all non-final syllables of 41 multisyllabic words. The study’s objectives are to (1) assess the relative difficulty of the six tones for learners (2) identify and explain common tone confusions (3) determine effects of linguistic context on identification and (4) determine effects of short-term learning. The results suggest that tones 2, 32, and 4 are easier for learners, while tones 1, 23, and 3 pose greater challenges. When participants’ categorization was inaccurate, they still recognized general pitch contours and pitch levels. Their responses also showed significant learning effects for two tones, as well as effects of tonal context.

UNM’s Digital Repository (University of New Mexico)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Phonetics and Phonology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Factors influencing L2 Tone Perception in Cherokee · UNM’s Digital Repository (University of New Mexico) (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS