Means of Production with Minds of Their Own: Food Animals, Abstract Labour and Surplus Value

This article critically examines the role of nonhuman animals in capital accumulation, with a particular focus on food animals in capitalist agriculture. Addressing debates at the intersection of Marxism and animal studies on the nature of ‘animal work’, it challenges the view that Marx’s analysis of capital accumulation is anthropocentric and rejects pseudo-Marxist reworkings of value theory which posit food animal ‘labour’ as a source of surplus value. It argues instead that whilst animals perform concrete work, producing use values which are appropriated by capital on a vast scale, this work is not rendered abstract labour and therefore does not generate surplus value. The article proposes an alternative three-fold framework for understanding food animals under capitalism: as sentient raw materials, as living instruments of labour, and as commodities in social reproduction. In this way it traces how the bio-physical work of animals is used both to increase the productivity and to reduce the value of abstract labour, which thus mediates surplus value extraction. It concludes with some preliminary reflections on the implications for socialist animal politics.

Publication Details

Journal
Research Explorer (The University of Manchester)
Published
2025-11-02
Primary Topic
Geographies of human-animal interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Means of Production with Minds of Their Own: Food Animals, Abstract Labour and Surplus Value

Research Explorer (The University of Manchester)
Geographies of human-animal interactions
article

Means of Production with Minds of Their Own: Food Animals, Abstract Labour and Surplus Value

article en

Abstract

This article critically examines the role of nonhuman animals in capital accumulation, with a particular focus on food animals in capitalist agriculture. Addressing debates at the intersection of Marxism and animal studies on the nature of ‘animal work’, it challenges the view that Marx’s analysis of capital accumulation is anthropocentric and rejects pseudo-Marxist reworkings of value theory which posit food animal ‘labour’ as a source of surplus value. It argues instead that whilst animals perform concrete work, producing use values which are appropriated by capital on a vast scale, this work is not rendered abstract labour and therefore does not generate surplus value. The article proposes an alternative three-fold framework for understanding food animals under capitalism: as sentient raw materials, as living instruments of labour, and as commodities in social reproduction. In this way it traces how the bio-physical work of animals is used both to increase the productivity and to reduce the value of abstract labour, which thus mediates surplus value extraction. It concludes with some preliminary reflections on the implications for socialist animal politics.

Research Explorer (The University of Manchester)
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Geographies of human-animal interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Means of Production with Minds of Their Own: Food Animals, Abstract Labour and Surplus Value · Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS