Het Incorporeren van Menselijke Mobiliteit en Stedelijke Morfologie in de Afbakening van Buurtgrenzen.

Although neighborhoods are a central concept in urban-geographical and social-scientific research, our understanding of them remains simultaneously specific and vague. Our understanding is specific in that we know neighborhoods exist as people often think about, make sense of, and engage with their cities through the lens of neighborhoods. We also know that neighborhoods can influence people's life choices and wellbeing. However, it is often vague and unclear where one neighborhood ends, and another one begins. This lack of clarity is problematic because neighborhood boundaries are a practical requirement of much quantitative empirical research. Using the 'wrong' boundaries can bias results and hamper planning and policy interventions. This dissertation engages with the long-standing and intractable problem of identifying and delineating the 'right' neighborhood boundaries. Neighborhood boundaries are often conceptualized by people in relation to their lives. People have an intuitive, yet often implicit, understanding of who is part of 'their' neighborhood and where neighborhood boundaries are. This multitude of boundaries is challenging to use in research. Seeking standardization, researchers look to other means of delineating neighborhoods. They rely on administrative units, which may be distinct from neighborhood conceptualizations, or on approaches that narrow neighborhood conceptualizations down to just one dimension, often proximity in Euclidean terms. Such approaches assume that proximate individuals form communities without considering the presence of morphological (e.g., buildings and streets) and natural (e.g., canals and rivers) barriers. More recently, researchers have drawn on the affordances of novel big mobility datasets to proxy communities and delineate neighborhoods. However, the adoption of such methods remains nascent. Against this backdrop, this dissertation approaches the problem of delineating neighborhoods by advancing two central ideas: (1) neighborhoods can be conceptualized in relation to people's interactions borne of their daily mobility, and (2) the morphology of cities influences such interactions. Using these ideas, this dissertation develops neighborhood delineation methods for two applications: first, to use in studying socio-spatial processes such as segregation, and second, for studying neighborhoods themselves. Specifically, neighborhoods are identified as regions accessible within a certain travel time, taking the city's morphological structure into account. These neighborhoods are delineated at multiple scales and are used in concert with administrative divisions, to examine how people experience ethnic segregation in different areas and on different scales. Additionally, neighborhoods are delineated as consisting of multiple dimensions, allowing for the customization of neighborhood boundaries to meet specific research needs. Neighborhood boundaries are also conceptualized as having different intensities, inversely corresponding to the flows of people between adjacent neighborhoods. These intensities provide insights into the relationships among residents of different neighborhoods offering a more nuanced understanding of inter-neighborhood segregation. Drawing on the combined utility of this work, a set of guidelines is developed to assist researchers in incorporating mobility and morphology into neighborhood delineations.

Publication Details

Journal
Lirias (KU Leuven)
Published
2025-05-26
Primary Topic
Urban Design and Spatial Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Het Incorporeren van Menselijke Mobiliteit en Stedelijke Morfologie in de Afbakening van Buurtgrenzen.

Lirias (KU Leuven)
Urban Design and Spatial Analysis
article

Het Incorporeren van Menselijke Mobiliteit en Stedelijke Morfologie in de Afbakening van Buurtgrenzen.

article en

Abstract

Although neighborhoods are a central concept in urban-geographical and social-scientific research, our understanding of them remains simultaneously specific and vague. Our understanding is specific in that we know neighborhoods exist as people often think about, make sense of, and engage with their cities through the lens of neighborhoods. We also know that neighborhoods can influence people's life choices and wellbeing. However, it is often vague and unclear where one neighborhood ends, and another one begins. This lack of clarity is problematic because neighborhood boundaries are a practical requirement of much quantitative empirical research. Using the 'wrong' boundaries can bias results and hamper planning and policy interventions. This dissertation engages with the long-standing and intractable problem of identifying and delineating the 'right' neighborhood boundaries. Neighborhood boundaries are often conceptualized by people in relation to their lives. People have an intuitive, yet often implicit, understanding of who is part of 'their' neighborhood and where neighborhood boundaries are. This multitude of boundaries is challenging to use in research. Seeking standardization, researchers look to other means of delineating neighborhoods. They rely on administrative units, which may be distinct from neighborhood conceptualizations, or on approaches that narrow neighborhood conceptualizations down to just one dimension, often proximity in Euclidean terms. Such approaches assume that proximate individuals form communities without considering the presence of morphological (e.g., buildings and streets) and natural (e.g., canals and rivers) barriers. More recently, researchers have drawn on the affordances of novel big mobility datasets to proxy communities and delineate neighborhoods. However, the adoption of such methods remains nascent. Against this backdrop, this dissertation approaches the problem of delineating neighborhoods by advancing two central ideas: (1) neighborhoods can be conceptualized in relation to people's interactions borne of their daily mobility, and (2) the morphology of cities influences such interactions. Using these ideas, this dissertation develops neighborhood delineation methods for two applications: first, to use in studying socio-spatial processes such as segregation, and second, for studying neighborhoods themselves. Specifically, neighborhoods are identified as regions accessible within a certain travel time, taking the city's morphological structure into account. These neighborhoods are delineated at multiple scales and are used in concert with administrative divisions, to examine how people experience ethnic segregation in different areas and on different scales. Additionally, neighborhoods are delineated as consisting of multiple dimensions, allowing for the customization of neighborhood boundaries to meet specific research needs. Neighborhood boundaries are also conceptualized as having different intensities, inversely corresponding to the flows of people between adjacent neighborhoods. These intensities provide insights into the relationships among residents of different neighborhoods offering a more nuanced understanding of inter-neighborhood segregation. Drawing on the combined utility of this work, a set of guidelines is developed to assist researchers in incorporating mobility and morphology into neighborhood delineations.

Lirias (KU Leuven)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Urban Design and Spatial Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.