Перехід та узгодження положень про Hypotheek та Credietverband щодо визнання й коригування перехідних положень забезпечувальних прав

This study explores the legal recognition and transition of property security systems from the Dutch colonial instruments Hypotheek and Credietverband to the national system of Security Rights as regulated under Law No. 4 of 1996 concerning Mortgage Rights. Using a normative juridical approach, the research reveals that legal acknowledgment of the legacy systems is still maintained under Article 57 of the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA) and Article 24 of the Law on Mortgage Rights (UUHT). However, the absence of a clear and systematic conversion mechanism has created disharmony within the legal system, especially regarding land registration and enforcement practices. This has led to legal uncertainty, particularly in banking and credit sectors where the execution of collateral is essential. The Supreme Court Decision No. 1947 K/Pdt/2010 serves as a case study highlighting the legal ambiguity and operational challenges that arise from this transitional gap. To ensure legal certainty and economic stability, this study recommends legal harmonization through technical regulations, digital archiving of historical security documents, and capacity building for legal institutions and stakeholders.

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific periodicals of Ukraine
Published
2025-10-23
Primary Topic
Comparative and International Law Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Перехід та узгодження положень про Hypotheek та Credietverband щодо визнання й коригування перехідних положень забезпечувальних прав

Scientific periodicals of Ukraine
Comparative and International Law Studies
article

Перехід та узгодження положень про Hypotheek та Credietverband щодо визнання й коригування перехідних положень забезпечувальних прав

article en

Abstract

This study explores the legal recognition and transition of property security systems from the Dutch colonial instruments Hypotheek and Credietverband to the national system of Security Rights as regulated under Law No. 4 of 1996 concerning Mortgage Rights. Using a normative juridical approach, the research reveals that legal acknowledgment of the legacy systems is still maintained under Article 57 of the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA) and Article 24 of the Law on Mortgage Rights (UUHT). However, the absence of a clear and systematic conversion mechanism has created disharmony within the legal system, especially regarding land registration and enforcement practices. This has led to legal uncertainty, particularly in banking and credit sectors where the execution of collateral is essential. The Supreme Court Decision No. 1947 K/Pdt/2010 serves as a case study highlighting the legal ambiguity and operational challenges that arise from this transitional gap. To ensure legal certainty and economic stability, this study recommends legal harmonization through technical regulations, digital archiving of historical security documents, and capacity building for legal institutions and stakeholders.

Scientific periodicals of Ukraine
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Comparative and International Law Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.