Human Enhancement from Precision Medicine: A Case Study on the Future of Humanity

This case study explores the future of precision medicine and whether it might essentially redefine human reproduction, identity, and social equity. Originally envisioned to eliminate genetic disease, instruments like CRISPR-Cas9 are now being contemplated as a method of human enhancement—opening the Pandora's box of the alleged "designer babies." Through the use of a case scenario, the case asks essential questions regarding a future where genetic editing is employed as a tool of socioeconomic advancement, amassing power and privilege in the hands of those capable of affording bio-enhancement. Students are asked to reflect on the ethical, legal, and philosophical implications of genetically engineered traits—intelligence, beauty, or athleticism, for example—becoming prerequisites for social mobility, employment, and political representation. The case brings to center stage debates about autonomy, consent, diversity, and the threat of eugenic thinking, as well as analogies to contemporary forms of genetic discrimination and inequalities in healthcare access. It challenges students to think about what constitutes the "ideal human," how policy regimes must shift, and whether human evolution must proceed as a natural process or a designed, commodified future.

Publication Details

Journal
VTechWorks (Virginia Tech)
Published
2025-06-02
Primary Topic
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Human Enhancement from Precision Medicine: A Case Study on the Future of Humanity

VTechWorks (Virginia Tech)
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
article

Human Enhancement from Precision Medicine: A Case Study on the Future of Humanity

article en

Abstract

This case study explores the future of precision medicine and whether it might essentially redefine human reproduction, identity, and social equity. Originally envisioned to eliminate genetic disease, instruments like CRISPR-Cas9 are now being contemplated as a method of human enhancement—opening the Pandora's box of the alleged "designer babies." Through the use of a case scenario, the case asks essential questions regarding a future where genetic editing is employed as a tool of socioeconomic advancement, amassing power and privilege in the hands of those capable of affording bio-enhancement. Students are asked to reflect on the ethical, legal, and philosophical implications of genetically engineered traits—intelligence, beauty, or athleticism, for example—becoming prerequisites for social mobility, employment, and political representation. The case brings to center stage debates about autonomy, consent, diversity, and the threat of eugenic thinking, as well as analogies to contemporary forms of genetic discrimination and inequalities in healthcare access. It challenges students to think about what constitutes the "ideal human," how policy regimes must shift, and whether human evolution must proceed as a natural process or a designed, commodified future.

VTechWorks (Virginia Tech)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.