Identification of Induced Polarization affected Transient Electromagnetic Data by Deep Learning

Recent advances in transient electromagnetic (TEM) methodologies have increasingly highlighted the presence of induced polarization (IP) effects across various geological settings. Modeling these effects involves treating subsurface resistivity as frequency-dependent. However, when IP effects are minimal, this complex resistivity simplifies to a real-valued form, allowing the subsurface to be modelled through simpler approaches. Thus, the computational complexity of modeling TEM data significantly varies depending on the presence of IP effects. Additionally, high correlation among IP model parameters increases the number of equivalent models, further complicating the inverse modeling process. The problem exacerbates as TEM data with minimal IP effects can also be modeled using IP parameters due to the correlation issues and inversion limitations, potentially distorting the real-valued resistivity parameter. These complexities necessitate the need for a two-stage process, aligned with Occam's Razor, which advocates adopting the simplest conditions unless more complex ones are necessary. However, manually distinguishing these data sets is complex and time-consuming, and often requires extensive expert analysis.<br/><br/>To address these challenges, we introduce a two-stage deep learning method that automates the identification of TEM data across three categories: data suitable for resistivity-only modeling, data requiring IP modeling, and data that cannot be modeled using either method. The first stage distinguishes between data that can be modeled using simple 1-D resistivity-only conditions and data that falls outside this assumption. Subsequently, the second stage then focuses on the latter, further distinguishing data that necessitates the incorporation of IP parameters and data that remains unmodelable. We test the effectiveness of our methodology on a small tTEM dataset acquired in Kigadye, Tanzania, which covers 12-line kms. The results demonstrate that the proposed approach effectively distinguishes between data that can be modeled using resistivity-only conditions and those requiring IP modeling. With this distinction in place, the next step calls for an inversion methodology that can collectively model these data based on their respective categories.

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-12-01
Primary Topic
Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identification of Induced Polarization affected Transient Electromagnetic Data by Deep Learning

Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
article

Identification of Induced Polarization affected Transient Electromagnetic Data by Deep Learning

article en

Abstract

Recent advances in transient electromagnetic (TEM) methodologies have increasingly highlighted the presence of induced polarization (IP) effects across various geological settings. Modeling these effects involves treating subsurface resistivity as frequency-dependent. However, when IP effects are minimal, this complex resistivity simplifies to a real-valued form, allowing the subsurface to be modelled through simpler approaches. Thus, the computational complexity of modeling TEM data significantly varies depending on the presence of IP effects. Additionally, high correlation among IP model parameters increases the number of equivalent models, further complicating the inverse modeling process. The problem exacerbates as TEM data with minimal IP effects can also be modeled using IP parameters due to the correlation issues and inversion limitations, potentially distorting the real-valued resistivity parameter. These complexities necessitate the need for a two-stage process, aligned with Occam's Razor, which advocates adopting the simplest conditions unless more complex ones are necessary. However, manually distinguishing these data sets is complex and time-consuming, and often requires extensive expert analysis.<br/><br/>To address these challenges, we introduce a two-stage deep learning method that automates the identification of TEM data across three categories: data suitable for resistivity-only modeling, data requiring IP modeling, and data that cannot be modeled using either method. The first stage distinguishes between data that can be modeled using simple 1-D resistivity-only conditions and data that falls outside this assumption. Subsequently, the second stage then focuses on the latter, further distinguishing data that necessitates the incorporation of IP parameters and data that remains unmodelable. We test the effectiveness of our methodology on a small tTEM dataset acquired in Kigadye, Tanzania, which covers 12-line kms. The results demonstrate that the proposed approach effectively distinguishes between data that can be modeled using resistivity-only conditions and those requiring IP modeling. With this distinction in place, the next step calls for an inversion methodology that can collectively model these data based on their respective categories.

Signal Processing (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Identification of Induced Polarization affected Transient Electromagnetic Data by Deep Learning · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS