Disaster and Development

This chapter discusses the relationship between law, disasters, and development. Despite the long-standing and intimate relationship between disasters and development there is surprisingly little legal scholarship on the subject. The chapter offers a historical and conceptual framework for understanding the relationship and its impact on international law and policy-making and argues the adoption of Sustainable Development Goals and the advent of paradigms such as resilience, climate change adaptation, and catastrophic risk management are rationalizing our understanding of disasters along new and unchartered trajectories. Ignoring the legal, political, and economic causes of global inequality, experts and policy-makers committed to these paths often rely on ahistorical assumptions. In order to counter these trends, scholars must turn their attention to how the international economic system and objectivist claims underlying development agendas and metrics may be structuring relations between and within countries in ways that entrench historical inequities rather than ground promises of hope.

Publication Details

Journal
eYLS (Yale Law School)
Published
2024-09-27
Primary Topic
Disaster Management and Resilience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Disaster and Development

eYLS (Yale Law School)
Disaster Management and Resilience
article

Disaster and Development

article en

Abstract

This chapter discusses the relationship between law, disasters, and development. Despite the long-standing and intimate relationship between disasters and development there is surprisingly little legal scholarship on the subject. The chapter offers a historical and conceptual framework for understanding the relationship and its impact on international law and policy-making and argues the adoption of Sustainable Development Goals and the advent of paradigms such as resilience, climate change adaptation, and catastrophic risk management are rationalizing our understanding of disasters along new and unchartered trajectories. Ignoring the legal, political, and economic causes of global inequality, experts and policy-makers committed to these paths often rely on ahistorical assumptions. In order to counter these trends, scholars must turn their attention to how the international economic system and objectivist claims underlying development agendas and metrics may be structuring relations between and within countries in ways that entrench historical inequities rather than ground promises of hope.

eYLS (Yale Law School)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Disaster Management and Resilience
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.