Adaptation of the “Quality of Prenatal Care Questionnaire” (QPCQ) Into Turkish: A Validity and Reliability Study

İffet Güler Kaya,1 Esra Yılmaz,2 Besey Ören3 1Department of Midwifery, Istanbul Medipol University College of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey; 2Specialist Midwife, Health Sciences University, Hamidiye Health Sciences Institute, Istanbul, Turkey; 3University of Health Sciences, Hamidiye Faculty of Nursing, Department of Nursing, Division of Internal Medicine Nursing, Istanbul, TurkeyCorrespondence: İffet Güler Kaya, Istanbul Medipol University College of Health Sciences, Midwifery Department, Email [email protected]: An effectively managed prenatal care process guided by evidence-based information can lead to higher satisfaction, fewer hospital admissions, and reduced pregnancy-related morbidity and mortality rates. This study was conducted within a quantitative methodological paradigm and aimed to adapt the Quality of Prenatal Care Questionnaire (QPCQ) into Turkish and evaluate its psychometric properties in a Turkish sample.Methods: This methodological, cross-sectional study was conducted with 460 postpartum women between January and July 2021. After establishing the linguistic validity of the scale, validity and reliability analyses were conducted. Content validity was evaluated by an expert multidisciplinary panel, and construct validity was tested using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha, item–total correlations, and test–retest stability over a 28-day interval.Results: The Content Validity Index (CVI) of the Turkish version of the QPCQ was 0.945. Cronbach’s alpha for the entire scale was 0.936, while the alpha values for the subdimensions ranged between 0.74 and 0.92. In light of the structural equation analysis and model findings, the six-subscale, 46-item original version of the questionnaire was found to have acceptable construct validity without excluding any items. Fit indices (CMIN/DF=3.316, CFI=0.805, GFI=0.726, RMSA=0.076, SRMR=0.056) indicated an acceptable model fit. These values were comparable to those of previous validations conducted in Canada (α=0.96) and Brazil (α=0.97), supporting the robustness of the Turkish adaptation.Conclusion: The Turkish version of the QPCQ is a valid and reliable instrument for evaluating the quality of prenatal care. This study contributes to the literature by providing the first comprehensive, psychometrically sound tool to measure prenatal care quality in Türkiye, which can be used in both clinical practice and research to improve maternal health outcomes.Keywords: prenatal care, health care quality, validation, translation, adaptation

Publication Details

Journal
Dove Medical Press (Taylor and Francis Group)
Published
2025-11-15
Primary Topic
Health Education and Validation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Adaptation of the “Quality of Prenatal Care Questionnaire” (QPCQ) Into Turkish: A Validity and Reliability Study

Dove Medical Press (Taylor and Francis Group)
Health Education and Validation
article

Adaptation of the “Quality of Prenatal Care Questionnaire” (QPCQ) Into Turkish: A Validity and Reliability Study

article en

Abstract

İffet Güler Kaya,1 Esra Yılmaz,2 Besey Ören3 1Department of Midwifery, Istanbul Medipol University College of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey; 2Specialist Midwife, Health Sciences University, Hamidiye Health Sciences Institute, Istanbul, Turkey; 3University of Health Sciences, Hamidiye Faculty of Nursing, Department of Nursing, Division of Internal Medicine Nursing, Istanbul, TurkeyCorrespondence: İffet Güler Kaya, Istanbul Medipol University College of Health Sciences, Midwifery Department, Email [email protected]: An effectively managed prenatal care process guided by evidence-based information can lead to higher satisfaction, fewer hospital admissions, and reduced pregnancy-related morbidity and mortality rates. This study was conducted within a quantitative methodological paradigm and aimed to adapt the Quality of Prenatal Care Questionnaire (QPCQ) into Turkish and evaluate its psychometric properties in a Turkish sample.Methods: This methodological, cross-sectional study was conducted with 460 postpartum women between January and July 2021. After establishing the linguistic validity of the scale, validity and reliability analyses were conducted. Content validity was evaluated by an expert multidisciplinary panel, and construct validity was tested using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha, item–total correlations, and test–retest stability over a 28-day interval.Results: The Content Validity Index (CVI) of the Turkish version of the QPCQ was 0.945. Cronbach’s alpha for the entire scale was 0.936, while the alpha values for the subdimensions ranged between 0.74 and 0.92. In light of the structural equation analysis and model findings, the six-subscale, 46-item original version of the questionnaire was found to have acceptable construct validity without excluding any items. Fit indices (CMIN/DF=3.316, CFI=0.805, GFI=0.726, RMSA=0.076, SRMR=0.056) indicated an acceptable model fit. These values were comparable to those of previous validations conducted in Canada (α=0.96) and Brazil (α=0.97), supporting the robustness of the Turkish adaptation.Conclusion: The Turkish version of the QPCQ is a valid and reliable instrument for evaluating the quality of prenatal care. This study contributes to the literature by providing the first comprehensive, psychometrically sound tool to measure prenatal care quality in Türkiye, which can be used in both clinical practice and research to improve maternal health outcomes.Keywords: prenatal care, health care quality, validation, translation, adaptation

Dove Medical Press (Taylor and Francis Group)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Health Education and Validation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.