S1359 Clinical Outcomes in CAD Patients With Non-Variceal GI Bleed and In-Hospital ACS: Impact of Anticoagulation in a Propensity-Matched Study

Introduction: Management of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in the setting of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding is complex. While anticoagulation remains a cornerstone of ACS management, the potential contribution of demand ischemia may influence decisions about its use. This study evaluates clinical outcomes in patients with prior coronary artery disease (CAD) admitted for non-variceal GI bleeding who developed ACS, comparing those who received anticoagulation to those who did not. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using TriNetX, a global federated health research network aggregating de-identified electronic health records. Adults (≥18 years) with a history of coronary artery disease (CAD) hospitalized for non-variceal upper or lower gastrointestinal bleeding were included. Patients who developed acute coronary syndrome (ACS) during hospitalization were divided into 2 groups: those who received anticoagulation with heparin and those who did not. Propensity score matching (1:1) was performed to balance baseline characteristics, including demographics, comorbidities (e.g., diabetes, chronic kidney disease), medication use (e.g., anticoagulants, statins), and race/ethnicity. Results: Before matching, 10,469 patients with a history of CAD admitted for non-variceal GI bleeding who developed ACS received heparin, compared to 20,107 similar patients who did not. After 1:1 propensity score matching, each cohort included 9,266 patients. Post-matching, anticoagulation was associated with a non-significant trend toward lower in-hospital mortality (OR 0.844, 95% CI 0.692–1.030) and reduced rebleeding (OR 0.944, 95% CI 0.882–1.010). ICU admission rates were similar between groups (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.416–2.404). However, patients receiving anticoagulation had significantly higher odds of requiring blood transfusion (OR 1.715, 95% CI 1.441–2.040). Conclusion: In patients with a history of CAD hospitalized for non-variceal GI bleeding who developed ACS, anticoagulation was not associated with a significant increase in mortality or rebleeding risk but was linked to higher transfusion requirements. Further prospective studies are needed to determine optimal management strategies in this complex clinical setting.

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001132896.61399.47
Primary Topic
Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S1359 Clinical Outcomes in CAD Patients With Non-Variceal GI Bleed and In-Hospital ACS: Impact of Anticoagulation in a Propensity-Matched Study

The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases
article

S1359 Clinical Outcomes in CAD Patients With Non-Variceal GI Bleed and In-Hospital ACS: Impact of Anticoagulation in a Propensity-Matched Study

article en

Abstract

Introduction: Management of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in the setting of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding is complex. While anticoagulation remains a cornerstone of ACS management, the potential contribution of demand ischemia may influence decisions about its use. This study evaluates clinical outcomes in patients with prior coronary artery disease (CAD) admitted for non-variceal GI bleeding who developed ACS, comparing those who received anticoagulation to those who did not. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using TriNetX, a global federated health research network aggregating de-identified electronic health records. Adults (≥18 years) with a history of coronary artery disease (CAD) hospitalized for non-variceal upper or lower gastrointestinal bleeding were included. Patients who developed acute coronary syndrome (ACS) during hospitalization were divided into 2 groups: those who received anticoagulation with heparin and those who did not. Propensity score matching (1:1) was performed to balance baseline characteristics, including demographics, comorbidities (e.g., diabetes, chronic kidney disease), medication use (e.g., anticoagulants, statins), and race/ethnicity. Results: Before matching, 10,469 patients with a history of CAD admitted for non-variceal GI bleeding who developed ACS received heparin, compared to 20,107 similar patients who did not. After 1:1 propensity score matching, each cohort included 9,266 patients. Post-matching, anticoagulation was associated with a non-significant trend toward lower in-hospital mortality (OR 0.844, 95% CI 0.692–1.030) and reduced rebleeding (OR 0.944, 95% CI 0.882–1.010). ICU admission rates were similar between groups (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.416–2.404). However, patients receiving anticoagulation had significantly higher odds of requiring blood transfusion (OR 1.715, 95% CI 1.441–2.040). Conclusion: In patients with a history of CAD hospitalized for non-variceal GI bleeding who developed ACS, anticoagulation was not associated with a significant increase in mortality or rebleeding risk but was linked to higher transfusion requirements. Further prospective studies are needed to determine optimal management strategies in this complex clinical setting.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 33%
Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

S1359 Clinical Outcomes in CAD Patients With Non-Variceal GI Bleed and In-Hospital ACS: Impact of Anticoagulation in a Propensity-Matched Study · The American Journal of Gastroenterology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS