MSE walls design in seismic regions

Reinforced soil walls perform relatively well under seismic action due to their flexibility. The current design practices consider the seismic action either by an analytical approach (Mononobe-Okabe formula) or by a pseudostatic analysis (geotechnical software). In both cases the seismic action is considered as a constant force acting in the horizontal direction outwards of the MSE wall. A vertical seismic force component may be added, which is generally a fraction of the horizontal one. Besides the simplified approaches, the seismic load can be considered in a more complex way by using accelerograms in FEM software. This method requires seismic records of the region as well as detailed geotechnical parameters for the foundation and backfill. The above mentioned dynamic approaches are discussed in the article along with their advantages and limitations. Some seismic recommendations from design codes are also included. Lastly, it is explained why the choice of the dynamic analysis method depends on the complexity of the situation.

Publication Details

Journal
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Published
2025-11-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202566203001/pdf
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

MSE walls design in seismic regions

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
article

MSE walls design in seismic regions

article en

Abstract

Reinforced soil walls perform relatively well under seismic action due to their flexibility. The current design practices consider the seismic action either by an analytical approach (Mononobe-Okabe formula) or by a pseudostatic analysis (geotechnical software). In both cases the seismic action is considered as a constant force acting in the horizontal direction outwards of the MSE wall. A vertical seismic force component may be added, which is generally a fraction of the horizontal one. Besides the simplified approaches, the seismic load can be considered in a more complex way by using accelerograms in FEM software. This method requires seismic records of the region as well as detailed geotechnical parameters for the foundation and backfill. The above mentioned dynamic approaches are discussed in the article along with their advantages and limitations. Some seismic recommendations from design codes are also included. Lastly, it is explained why the choice of the dynamic analysis method depends on the complexity of the situation.

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.