What key variables differentiating positions across age categories in rugby union?

Potential estimation (PE) in rugby union traditionally emphasizes physical, anthropometric, and biological attributes to distinguish between playing positions. Forwards are typically characterized by greater strength and power, whereas backs rely more on speed and agility. However, how these differentiators evolve across developmental stages remains underexplored. This study aimed to examine age-related changes in discriminative variables influencing positional differentiation across U14, U16, and U18 categories. A total of 139 national level male rugby players were assessed: U14 (n = 64), U16 (n = 51), and U18 (n = 24). Anthropometric data (height, body mass, body mass index (BMI)), maturity status (Y-PHV, MO), sprint performance (T10, T30), and horizontal force-velocity (F- v ) profiling were collected. ANOVAs and post hoc analyses explored differences across age and position. Decision tree models identified key discriminative variables, and a feature importance analysis was performed, complemented by a recurrence analysis. Findings revealed significant age- and position-related differences (p < 0.05). BMI and maturity variables were the most relevant at U14, while sprint and F- v metrics gained importance with age. In U18, physical performance indicators such as peak power, theoretical maximal horizontal force, and slope force velocity emerged as dominant. These results suggest a transition from anthropometric to performance-based differentiation across age groups, offering key insights for refining PE strategies in youth rugby.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching
Published
2025-12-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17479541251404184
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What key variables differentiating positions across age categories in rugby union?

International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching
Sports Performance and Training
article

What key variables differentiating positions across age categories in rugby union?

article en

Abstract

Potential estimation (PE) in rugby union traditionally emphasizes physical, anthropometric, and biological attributes to distinguish between playing positions. Forwards are typically characterized by greater strength and power, whereas backs rely more on speed and agility. However, how these differentiators evolve across developmental stages remains underexplored. This study aimed to examine age-related changes in discriminative variables influencing positional differentiation across U14, U16, and U18 categories. A total of 139 national level male rugby players were assessed: U14 (n = 64), U16 (n = 51), and U18 (n = 24). Anthropometric data (height, body mass, body mass index (BMI)), maturity status (Y-PHV, MO), sprint performance (T10, T30), and horizontal force-velocity (F- v ) profiling were collected. ANOVAs and post hoc analyses explored differences across age and position. Decision tree models identified key discriminative variables, and a feature importance analysis was performed, complemented by a recurrence analysis. Findings revealed significant age- and position-related differences (p < 0.05). BMI and maturity variables were the most relevant at U14, while sprint and F- v metrics gained importance with age. In U18, physical performance indicators such as peak power, theoretical maximal horizontal force, and slope force velocity emerged as dominant. These results suggest a transition from anthropometric to performance-based differentiation across age groups, offering key insights for refining PE strategies in youth rugby.

International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching
Université de Toulon (FR), Toulon Var Technologies (France) (FR)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 37%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.