S1510 Efficacy of Etrasimod as First-Line Advanced Treatment Following Failure of Aminosalicylates Only: Data From the ELEVATE UC 52 Phase 3 Clinical Trial

Introduction: Etrasimod is an oral, once-daily, selective sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P)1,4,5 receptor modulator for the treatment of moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC). In patients with moderately to severely active UC, treatment guidelines recommend early use of advanced therapies rather than gradual step up after failure of 5-aminosalicylate (5-ASA). Methods: This prespecified subgroup analysis assessed the efficacy of etrasimod vs placebo in patients in ELEVATE UC 52 (NCT03945188) with, and without, prior oral 5-ASA failure only (defined as inadequate response, loss of response or intolerance to previous treatment with oral 5-ASA but not to any other previous UC medication). Efficacy endpoints assessed at Weeks 12 and 52 included clinical remission, endoscopic improvement, symptomatic remission and composite histological endpoints. Results: In total, 45 and 29 patients receiving etrasimod and placebo, respectively, had prior 5-ASA failure only and 244 and 115 patients did not. At Weeks 12 and 52, among those who had failed prior 5-ASA only, significantly more patients receiving etrasimod vs placebo achieved clinical remission (Week 12, % difference [Δ]: 38.3%, P < 0.001; Week 52, Δ: 45.0%, P < 0.001), endoscopic improvement (Week 12, Δ: 54.7%, P < 0.001; Week 52, Δ: 47.8%, P < 0.001), symptomatic remission (Week 12, Δ: 38.6%, P < 0.001; Week 52, Δ: 45.0%, P < 0.001), and endoscopic improvement-histologic remission (Week 12, Δ: 35.6%, P < 0.001; Week 52, Δ: 31.1%, P < 0.001). Significantly more patients receiving etrasimod vs placebo in this subgroup achieved endoscopic normalization-histologic remission (Week 12, Δ: 19.9%, P = 0.002; Week 52, Δ: 24.3%, P < 0.001) and disease clearance (Week 12, Δ: 15.6%, P = 0.008; Week 52, Δ: 27.8%, P < 0.001). Among those who had failed other therapies, significantly more patients receiving etrasimod vs placebo also achieved all endpoints at Weeks 12 and 52 (P < 0.01). Conclusion: Etrasimod demonstrated robust efficacy as first-line advanced therapy in patients who had failed oral 5-ASA only, across all evaluated endpoints including stringent composite histological endpoints, consistent with the overall ELEVATE UC population. Etrasimod shows efficacy when used early in the UC treatment algorithm. Pfizer’s generative artificial intelligence tool MAIA was used to assist production of the abstract first draft. Authors reviewed/edited and take responsibility for the content.

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001133500.51220.96
Primary Topic
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S1510 Efficacy of Etrasimod as First-Line Advanced Treatment Following Failure of Aminosalicylates Only: Data From the ELEVATE UC 52 Phase 3 Clinical Trial

The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
article

S1510 Efficacy of Etrasimod as First-Line Advanced Treatment Following Failure of Aminosalicylates Only: Data From the ELEVATE UC 52 Phase 3 Clinical Trial

article en

Abstract

Introduction: Etrasimod is an oral, once-daily, selective sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P)1,4,5 receptor modulator for the treatment of moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (UC). In patients with moderately to severely active UC, treatment guidelines recommend early use of advanced therapies rather than gradual step up after failure of 5-aminosalicylate (5-ASA). Methods: This prespecified subgroup analysis assessed the efficacy of etrasimod vs placebo in patients in ELEVATE UC 52 (NCT03945188) with, and without, prior oral 5-ASA failure only (defined as inadequate response, loss of response or intolerance to previous treatment with oral 5-ASA but not to any other previous UC medication). Efficacy endpoints assessed at Weeks 12 and 52 included clinical remission, endoscopic improvement, symptomatic remission and composite histological endpoints. Results: In total, 45 and 29 patients receiving etrasimod and placebo, respectively, had prior 5-ASA failure only and 244 and 115 patients did not. At Weeks 12 and 52, among those who had failed prior 5-ASA only, significantly more patients receiving etrasimod vs placebo achieved clinical remission (Week 12, % difference [Δ]: 38.3%, P < 0.001; Week 52, Δ: 45.0%, P < 0.001), endoscopic improvement (Week 12, Δ: 54.7%, P < 0.001; Week 52, Δ: 47.8%, P < 0.001), symptomatic remission (Week 12, Δ: 38.6%, P < 0.001; Week 52, Δ: 45.0%, P < 0.001), and endoscopic improvement-histologic remission (Week 12, Δ: 35.6%, P < 0.001; Week 52, Δ: 31.1%, P < 0.001). Significantly more patients receiving etrasimod vs placebo in this subgroup achieved endoscopic normalization-histologic remission (Week 12, Δ: 19.9%, P = 0.002; Week 52, Δ: 24.3%, P < 0.001) and disease clearance (Week 12, Δ: 15.6%, P = 0.008; Week 52, Δ: 27.8%, P < 0.001). Among those who had failed other therapies, significantly more patients receiving etrasimod vs placebo also achieved all endpoints at Weeks 12 and 52 (P < 0.01). Conclusion: Etrasimod demonstrated robust efficacy as first-line advanced therapy in patients who had failed oral 5-ASA only, across all evaluated endpoints including stringent composite histological endpoints, consistent with the overall ELEVATE UC population. Etrasimod shows efficacy when used early in the UC treatment algorithm. Pfizer’s generative artificial intelligence tool MAIA was used to assist production of the abstract first draft. Authors reviewed/edited and take responsibility for the content.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.