Collective Risk Allocation and Restorative Justice in the Age of Artificial Intelligence

This essay investigates the “responsibility gap” introduced by artificial intelligence (AI) within the criminal justice system and examines potential shifts from traditional punitive models to restorative justice frameworks. It begins by outlining the challenges AI poses to conventional concepts of criminal liability, focusing on issues of moral agency and accountability. The discussion progresses to collective risk allocation mechanisms in the context of AI development and deployment, highlighting the ethical and legal dilemmas that arise. Finally, the essay explores the potential for restorative justice to address harm caused by AI-related errors, proposing a justice model that prioritises dialogue, accountability, and the repair of harm. The essay argues that a shift from individual criminal liability to collective responsibility is essential to adapt justice systems to the complexities of AI while ensuring the effective protection of fundamental rights. By expanding on the interplay between technological advancements, ethical governance, and justice, this work proposes a comprehensive framework to address the profound societal implications of AI, offering a forward-looking perspective on justice systems in an increasingly AI-driven world.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Contemporary Challenges The Global Crime Justice and Security Journal
Published
2025-12-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2218/ccj.v5.10284
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Collective Risk Allocation and Restorative Justice in the Age of Artificial Intelligence

Contemporary Challenges The Global Crime Justice and Security Journal
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Collective Risk Allocation and Restorative Justice in the Age of Artificial Intelligence

article en

Abstract

This essay investigates the “responsibility gap” introduced by artificial intelligence (AI) within the criminal justice system and examines potential shifts from traditional punitive models to restorative justice frameworks. It begins by outlining the challenges AI poses to conventional concepts of criminal liability, focusing on issues of moral agency and accountability. The discussion progresses to collective risk allocation mechanisms in the context of AI development and deployment, highlighting the ethical and legal dilemmas that arise. Finally, the essay explores the potential for restorative justice to address harm caused by AI-related errors, proposing a justice model that prioritises dialogue, accountability, and the repair of harm. The essay argues that a shift from individual criminal liability to collective responsibility is essential to adapt justice systems to the complexities of AI while ensuring the effective protection of fundamental rights. By expanding on the interplay between technological advancements, ethical governance, and justice, this work proposes a comprehensive framework to address the profound societal implications of AI, offering a forward-looking perspective on justice systems in an increasingly AI-driven world.

Contemporary Challenges The Global Crime Justice and Security JournalVol. 6
University of Padua (IT)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.