S1506 Segment Level Validation of a Deep Learning Model to Assess Endoscopic Severity in Ulcerative Colitis Using Regulatory-Grade Consensus

Introduction: Artificial Intelligence assessment of Endoscopic Severity and Extent (AI-ESe) is a deep learning approach to continuous assessment of inflammation on endoscopy in ulcerative colitis (UC). AI-ESe measures the endoscopic subscore at discrete segments from the rectum to the maximum extent, generating a granular heatmap of inflammatory activity. We aim to validate the performance of our segment-level endoscopic subscore assessment model. Methods: We used a previously developed deep learning model to assess the endoscopic subscore, and adapted the algorithm to optimize performance on segments. A total of 47 endoscopic video recordings from the Phase 3 induction trial for mirikizumab in UC (NCT03518086) and from routine practice were used as a holdout test set. Each video had segments pre-defined every 15 seconds with correction for stalling, aligned with AI-ESe’s design. A panel of 7 experienced human readers were trained to evaluate the endoscopy subscore with a minimum quadratic weighted kappa (QWK) of 0.6 required. Each segment was assigned an endoscopic subscore via independent assessment by 3 readers with the median assigned as the final segment score to mimic the 2+1 workflow, the current regulatory standard. We evaluated the agreement between the model and human readers. Results: A total of 823 segments were scored. Complete agreement in the endoscopy subscore among all 3 reviewers was achieved in 57.2% of segments, in line with published data on inter-rater variability among human reviewers. Inter-rater agreement for segment scores between the model and the final score generated via the 2+1 workflow was very good (QWK 0.82 (95% confidence interval 0.79-0.85)). Model performance is similar to any individual human reader (Spearman correlation range human-human 0.57-0.85, model-human 0.70-0.87). Conclusion: We demonstrate that our deep learning model accurately assesses the endoscopic subscore at a segment-level in UC. This supports the use of AI-ESe to accurately assess inflammation severity at a more granular level in UC.

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/01.ajg.0001133484.88867.05
Primary Topic
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

S1506 Segment Level Validation of a Deep Learning Model to Assess Endoscopic Severity in Ulcerative Colitis Using Regulatory-Grade Consensus

The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
article

S1506 Segment Level Validation of a Deep Learning Model to Assess Endoscopic Severity in Ulcerative Colitis Using Regulatory-Grade Consensus

article en

Abstract

Introduction: Artificial Intelligence assessment of Endoscopic Severity and Extent (AI-ESe) is a deep learning approach to continuous assessment of inflammation on endoscopy in ulcerative colitis (UC). AI-ESe measures the endoscopic subscore at discrete segments from the rectum to the maximum extent, generating a granular heatmap of inflammatory activity. We aim to validate the performance of our segment-level endoscopic subscore assessment model. Methods: We used a previously developed deep learning model to assess the endoscopic subscore, and adapted the algorithm to optimize performance on segments. A total of 47 endoscopic video recordings from the Phase 3 induction trial for mirikizumab in UC (NCT03518086) and from routine practice were used as a holdout test set. Each video had segments pre-defined every 15 seconds with correction for stalling, aligned with AI-ESe’s design. A panel of 7 experienced human readers were trained to evaluate the endoscopy subscore with a minimum quadratic weighted kappa (QWK) of 0.6 required. Each segment was assigned an endoscopic subscore via independent assessment by 3 readers with the median assigned as the final segment score to mimic the 2+1 workflow, the current regulatory standard. We evaluated the agreement between the model and human readers. Results: A total of 823 segments were scored. Complete agreement in the endoscopy subscore among all 3 reviewers was achieved in 57.2% of segments, in line with published data on inter-rater variability among human reviewers. Inter-rater agreement for segment scores between the model and the final score generated via the 2+1 workflow was very good (QWK 0.82 (95% confidence interval 0.79-0.85)). Model performance is similar to any individual human reader (Spearman correlation range human-human 0.57-0.85, model-human 0.70-0.87). Conclusion: We demonstrate that our deep learning model accurately assesses the endoscopic subscore at a segment-level in UC. This supports the use of AI-ESe to accurately assess inflammation severity at a more granular level in UC.

The American Journal of GastroenterologyVol. 120(10S2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.