Participants or pretenders? Addressing the challenge of inauthentic participation encountered during three social research studies on experiences of food insecurity in the UK

Individuals participate in research for numerous reasons, however, the global economic downturn may have driven some to participate solely for monetary recompense. While inauthentic participation is more widely recognised in quantitative survey studies, it is increasingly becoming an issue in qualitative research. Drawing on our experiences and supported by the wider literature, we highlight ways in which inauthentic participation can be identified and addressed. We argue that pertinent researchers are aware of the risks and potential impact of inauthentic participants and recommend researchers consider this phenomenon from study planning stages onwards. We identify institutions, including Universities, as well placed to provide training and ensure, where necessary, mitigation plans are in place. We suggest ethics committees, funders and publishers request inauthentic participation be considered and reported. These recommendations would establish awareness of this phenomenon, prevent wasting valuable project resources, increase transparency of reporting and ensure data integrity is protected.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Social Research Methodology
Published
2025-12-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2025.2601993
Primary Topic
Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Participants or pretenders? Addressing the challenge of inauthentic participation encountered during three social research studies on experiences of food insecurity in the UK

International Journal of Social Research Methodology
Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
article

Participants or pretenders? Addressing the challenge of inauthentic participation encountered during three social research studies on experiences of food insecurity in the UK

article en

Abstract

Individuals participate in research for numerous reasons, however, the global economic downturn may have driven some to participate solely for monetary recompense. While inauthentic participation is more widely recognised in quantitative survey studies, it is increasingly becoming an issue in qualitative research. Drawing on our experiences and supported by the wider literature, we highlight ways in which inauthentic participation can be identified and addressed. We argue that pertinent researchers are aware of the risks and potential impact of inauthentic participants and recommend researchers consider this phenomenon from study planning stages onwards. We identify institutions, including Universities, as well placed to provide training and ensure, where necessary, mitigation plans are in place. We suggest ethics committees, funders and publishers request inauthentic participation be considered and reported. These recommendations would establish awareness of this phenomenon, prevent wasting valuable project resources, increase transparency of reporting and ensure data integrity is protected.

International Journal of Social Research Methodology
University of Liverpool (GB), University of Aberdeen (GB), Aberdeen City Council (GB), Robert Gordon University (GB), Leeds Beckett University (GB)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.