Dose-Response Relationship Between Social Support and Quality of Life in End-Stage Renal Disease

Background and aims: Evaluating quality of life is essential for addressing patients’ fundamental challenges and guiding treatment approaches. This study examined the quality of life and the factors influencing it among patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in Western Iran over one year, using a census-based approach. Data were collected via the SF-36 Quality of Life Questionnaire and structured social support assessments. Crude and adjusted linear regression models were employed to assess associations. Results: The results indicated that 92.4% of patients reported a moderate quality of life, while 32.8% experienced moderate social support. The mean quality of life score was 50.48±5.86, and the mean social support score was 42.29±5.65. Quality of Life scores increased steadily with rising social support, peaking around a score of 40, followed by a slight decline beyond this threshold. Adjusted regression analysis confirmed that social support significantly enhances quality of life (P=0.032; β=2.86, 95% CI: 1.77, 3.95). Additionally, individuals with higher economic status demonstrated better quality of life outcomes (P<0.001; β=2.48, 95% CI: 0.50, 4.46). Additional significant associations were observed for age group (P=0.01), smoking status (P=0.02), and support from welfare organizations (P=0.01). Conclusion: This study established a direct association between quality of life and social support, with significant connections observed in physical health, social relationships, and overall well-being.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Epidemiology and Health System Journal
Published
2025-12-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.34172/ehsj.26368
Primary Topic
Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dose-Response Relationship Between Social Support and Quality of Life in End-Stage Renal Disease

Epidemiology and Health System Journal
Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
article

Dose-Response Relationship Between Social Support and Quality of Life in End-Stage Renal Disease

article en

Abstract

Background and aims: Evaluating quality of life is essential for addressing patients’ fundamental challenges and guiding treatment approaches. This study examined the quality of life and the factors influencing it among patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in Western Iran over one year, using a census-based approach. Data were collected via the SF-36 Quality of Life Questionnaire and structured social support assessments. Crude and adjusted linear regression models were employed to assess associations. Results: The results indicated that 92.4% of patients reported a moderate quality of life, while 32.8% experienced moderate social support. The mean quality of life score was 50.48±5.86, and the mean social support score was 42.29±5.65. Quality of Life scores increased steadily with rising social support, peaking around a score of 40, followed by a slight decline beyond this threshold. Adjusted regression analysis confirmed that social support significantly enhances quality of life (P=0.032; β=2.86, 95% CI: 1.77, 3.95). Additionally, individuals with higher economic status demonstrated better quality of life outcomes (P<0.001; β=2.48, 95% CI: 0.50, 4.46). Additional significant associations were observed for age group (P=0.01), smoking status (P=0.02), and support from welfare organizations (P=0.01). Conclusion: This study established a direct association between quality of life and social support, with significant connections observed in physical health, social relationships, and overall well-being.

Epidemiology and Health System JournalVol. 12(2)
Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.